Thursday, February 26, 2026

Hamnet plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

“The play’s the thing”
(from Hamlet [William Shakespeare, c. 1599-1601] Act II, Scene 2)

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, but better options are on the horizon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue below [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.


Hamnet (ChloĆ© Zhao, 2025)   rated PG-13    136 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red. OK, now continue on if you prefer.


WHAT HAPPENS: (This film is largely fictional drama, though it’s somewhat inspired by a few historical facts.  As it begins, a title card tells us in late 16th-century England the names “Hamnet” and “Hamlet” were seen as identical.)  In the 1580s in Stratford-upon-Avon, England, Agnes (not Anne this time) Hathaway (Jessie Buckley) is a young woman strongly in tune with nature (stories are her mother was a witch, but at the very least she taught Agnes about mystical connections with the biological world) who has a pet falcon, often sleeps in the woods; then meets also-young William Shakespeare (Paul Mescal) with aspirations of being a poet (even as his brutal father, John [David Wilmot], insists he should be a farmer), barely supports himself by teaching Latin to a few local boys.  He’s immediately smitten with her, she returns the favor, and due to little support from either family the young lovers marry (she’s pregnant), soon have a daughter, Susanna (Bodhi Rae Breathnach).  Well aware of her husband’s frustration with his stalled life, Agnes has her brother, Bartholomew (Joe Alwyn), take Will to London to start a theatrical career while she and Susanna remain in Stratford, even as she’s pregnant again.  When delivery time comes she tries to go to the woods but Will’s family keeps her at home where she gives birth to twins Judith (Olivia Lynes) and Hamnet (Jacobi Jupe); Judith seems to be stillborn until Agnes’ powers revive this child.  

 

 A few years later, with Will only home infrequently as his plays are successful, Judith contracts the deadly bubonic/black plague, is dying until Hamnet somehow trades his life for hers, with Agnes unable to save him.  Agnes is furious with Will for not being there when his son expired (in 1596), but he soon departs for London again where he writes Hamlet.  When Agnes learns of this new work she’s horrified that it uses their son’s name so she goes to London to confront Will.  Attending the play, though, she sees Hamlet (Noah Jupe, Jacobi’s older brother) is the troubled prince of Denmark with Will playing the ghost of Hamlet’s father, in a way showing his grief for the dead boy by becoming the dead one while allowing Hamnet to grow to young adulthood as Hamlet.  Agnes pushes her way through the groundlings to the edge of the stage as we see a few additional scenes from the play, ending with Hamlet’s death, at which point she reaches out to hold the actor’s hand, prompting those around her to also reach out to the stage.  The film ends with Agnes now seeing Hamnet alive on the stage before he looks at her, then walks into the backstage darkness as Agnes seems to now be reconciled with Will.⇐  If you’d like additional plot details, you can visit this site.


SO WHAT? Given the consistently positive things I’d read about Hamnet last fall I anxiously awaited for it to stream (although CCAL numbers aren’t as high as I’d anticipated; a bit more on that in this review’s next section below); my anticipation was further enhanced when Oscar nominations were announced as Hamnet’s up for Best Picture, Director (Zhao previously won both of those for her 2020 Nomadland as she was also one of the producers), Actress in a Leading Role (as a possible foreshadowing for this year, in Nomadland Francis McDormand won in this category), Adapted Screenplay, Original Score, Production Design, Costuming, and Casting with some decent chances to win in any of those (although it’s up against tough competition from One Battle After Another [Paul Thomas Anderson, 2025] in most contests, and I barely prefer either Emma Stone [Bugonia, Yorgos Lanathimos, 2025] or Rose Byrne [If I Had Legs I'd Kick You, Mary Bronstein, 2025] to Buckley, although she does successfully become the intensifying focus of her film).  Hamnet’s adapted from the novel of the same name by Maggie O’Farrell (2020), which my generally-better-read-than-me wife Nina found to be superior to its cinematic adaption (even though O’Farrell’s listed as co-screenwriter with Zhao) for many of the same reasons Nicholas Barber’s put off by it (his review also in the section below) as well as not that much focus in the film on the plague that was so prevalent in those days and her disappointment with the adaptation’s last scene where Agnes is at the London production of Hamlet which in the book includes only the play’s interaction between Prince Hamlet and the ghost of his dead father, King Hamlet (Act I, Scene 5), as the ghost leaves the stage saying to his son “Remember me,” whereas in the film we get considerably more of the play, ending with Hamlet's death, then Agnes’ private vision of young Hamnet turning away after looking at his mother, walking into the backstage darkness.  Nina found a lot of impact in the “Remember me” statement, thought it would have been appropriate for Agnes’ vision of young Hamnet to have said it as he left, but instead there's their silent acknowledgement of each other.⇐


 With Nina's encouragement, I read just those last few pages of the book (no option at present to explore more as much time was spent this week, just like last week, on computer repair, tax prep, watching Olympics figure skating, plus enduring much of Agent Orange’s State of the Union speech—I was in need of getting my heart rate up to stroke level, I guess [all of which contributed to this posting arriving considerably later than I intended]) as I tried to keep my record clean on rarely reading the novel a film comes from in order to avoid the inevitable letdown that tries to appreciate both media versions given how much more an author can do with unlimited page space and intricate structures, experiencing even in a few paragraphs what an eloquent writer O’Farrell is.  Because all I really know is the film, I found it quite sorrowfully-impactful with marvelous performances by Buckley and Mescal; I was probably also encouraged to my 4 stars by the inclusion of several scenes from the Hamlet play, what I consider to be the finest narrative ever written for the stage, with the marvelous Kenneth Branagh directed/starring Hamlet (1996) as being the only adaptation I've seen that uses/captures the full material of that lengthy theatre version.  But, in regard to Hamnet, if you’d like to explore more about it you could begin with this short video (3:36) which examines how much of this story is based in history vs. what's viable fiction, then you could move on to a marvelous, extensive video by my highly-respected analyst, Lucas Blue (24:46), where he explores symbols, themes, and the ending (so, yes, Spoilers are involved), all of which I think would enhance your experience of this fine film, even though you might ultimately prefer what you’d find in the novel.


BOTTOM LINE FINAL COMMENTS: Hamnet opened in domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters on November 26, 2025 with its widest release to 1,996 of them (still in 301) having grossed $23.1 million so far ($87 million worldwide), although it’s most likely found via streaming where it rents for $19.99 from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV.  The CCAL’s supportive of you watching it with 86% positive reviews at Rotten Tomatoes, an astoundingly-close 84% Metacritic average score, even as all of the praise I became aware months ago implied even higher numbers (in contrast, One Battle … got 95% from both critics-accumulation sites).  An example of someone who truly liked Hamnet (even more than me) is Peter Debruge of Variety (100% MC score  [just like 18 of their 54 cited critics with the same score, followed by a cluster of 80%s]) who says: In her [Zhao] hands, Shakespeare’s indelible line doesn’t represent a contemplation of suicide so much as what it means to be — to fully embrace life, when the inevitability of death is enough to paralyze one into a self-protective stupor. Ultimately, the filmmaker invites the world to feel loss in a new way, and in letting go, liberates something fundamental in all of us.”  Of course, you can’t please all of the people all of the time (even though Trump seems to claim that he can, based on that mostly-bullshit, way-longer-than-it-needed-to-be speech of his given this week), as voiced by those such as the BBC’s Nicholas Barber (40% MC score): “But does Hamnet live up to the promise of its stellar personnel? That is the question. It's true that many viewers have already fallen under its spell, but Zhao and O'Farrell have stripped away so much of what makes the novel magical – the time-travelling structure, the hypnotic prose rhythms, the internal monologues and the tiny, tangible details – that what's left is no more profound or authentic than any other costume drama set in ye olde days.” Ugh!


 I certainly wouldn’t go anywhere near Barber’s low in assigning stars, but based on what little I read of the book I can see that he (and Nina) has a position to at least argue from, given the richness of the novel; now, do I have such an acceptance with my unusual choice of a Musical Metaphor for Hamnet which I’m taking from Hamlet, the famous "To be or not to be" speech, because, really, what is a song but certain words said to a certain rhythm (iambic pentameter in this case) as what begins (Act III, Scene I) with “To be, or not to be, that is the question: / Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer / The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, / Or to take arms against a sea of troubles / And by opposing end them,” then continues on in grandly-eloquent, thought-provoking fashion sums up nicely what Agnes, Will, even Hamnet (not to mention us as we ponder what we’re seeing on screen) are dealing with in this sorrowful story, so I’ll give you a version of that soliloquy from well-honored screen adaptation of Hamlet directed by/starring Sir Laurence Olivier (1948; won Oscars for Best Picture, Actor, Art Direction-Set Decoration - Black and White, Costume Design - Black and White; RT 96%).  Yet, given my even-greater admiration for the Branagh take on Hamlet, I’ll leave you with your own consideration of watching Hamnet as you bask in this scene as delivered by Branagh.  (His version got 4 Oscar noms but no wins, so what do I know anyway? Well, maybe something, because Branagh’s version got 95% RT positives, a damn fine response!)

         

SHORT TAKES

                   

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.

 

If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

             

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

            

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 32,041.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):


Thursday, February 19, 2026

Marty Supreme and Song Sung Blue plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

A Complicated Passion for Ping-Pong
and Diamonds in the Rough

        

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, but better options are on the horizon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue below [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.

               

 (Above cartoon dutifully paid for.)


 As has happened so often in this still-young year last week was filled with a good many time-consuming events (especially in tedious preparation for meeting with my income tax pro, dealing with Nina’s laptop malware, and watching some of the Winter Olympics [those athletes are amazing]), so while I’m still on a mission to see whatever I can of the various Oscar nominees before the awards are announced on March 15, 2026 (go here and scroll down to view all of the contenders) I'm left with little opportunity to report back to you so here’s what I can share about my responses to a couple of them, while struggling to get this posted (no Spoilers from me, but some are in the links).

         

SHORT TAKES

                 

                         Marty Supreme (Josh Safdie, 2025)
                                           rated R    149 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)



 This one’s piled up a lot of positive response already since being released to domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters on December 19, 2025 (still in 465 of them with grosses so far of $94.6 million [globally $149.9 million]; you can also stream it with $19.99 rentals at Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV), featuring 9 Oscar noms (including Best Picture, Director, Actor in a Leading Role, Original Screenplay), although for me it runs too long, gets a bit lost with a subplot about a lost dog, and probably wouldn’t be my first choice in any of its Oscar categoriesalthough it's strongest in my opinion for Lead Actor (yet, even there I lean toward Leonardo DiCaprio in One Battle After Another [Paul Thomas Anderson, 2025])—despite a clear disagreement from the CCAL with the Rotten Tomatoes positive reviews at 94%, Metacritic average score at 89% (quite high for them).  It’s somewhat based on Marty Reisman, a noted American table tennis champ (and hustler; more about him here [15:34 video; ads interrupt at 1:05, 4:35, 7:55, 10:40, 13:20]) with this version of such a mercurial character starring TimothĆ©e Chalamet (winning the 2026 Golden Globe for Best Performance by a Male Actor in a Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy [an odd choice for this film in this category as there are few laughs in it, but One Battle … took their award for Best Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy over Marty …, another one without much fun, but still my choice at this point for Oscar’s Best Picture]) as Marty Mauser in 1952 NYC where working for his Uncle Murray (Larry “Ratso” Sloman) as a shoe salesman is far from his goal of becoming table tennis World Champion.  

 

 Marty lets nothing stop him in his quest for triumphs at tournaments in London and Tokyo, getting into an affair with aging actress Kay Stone (Gwyneth Palthrow) along the way (he’s got another one going with married childhood pal Rachel Mizler [Odessa A’zion]), eventually getting some financial support from her clueless husband, writing pen magnate Milton Rockwell (Kevin O’Leary), although Marty’s decisions about his dreams leave him constantly owing reimbursement for the various antics he’s used to further his ambitions.  You deserve more extensive plot details so go here to find them.  I’ll leave you with praise for Chalamet’s work and my usual Musical Metaphor, taken this time directly from the soundtrack, Tears for Fears’ "Everybody Wants to Rule the World" (1985 album Songs from the Big Chair) because for Marty and his main competitors (along with Rockwell) “All for freedom and for pleasure / Nothing ever lasts forever / Everybody wants to rule the world”; decades later for so many politicians/tech bros the attitude remains the same, but Marty does wise up finally.

              

                        Song Sung Blue (Craig Brewer, 2025)
                                      rated PG-13   133 min.


Here’s the trailer:


 My attention to this movie was based on Kate Hudson’s Oscar nomination as Best Actress in a Leading Role, but in retrospect I think she has little chance at winning given the competition she faces with my interest toward Rose Byrne in If I Had Legs I'd Kick You (Mary Bronstein, 2025), along with all the good things I’ve heard (but haven’t verified with a viewing yet … but soon) about Jessie Buckley in Hamnet (ChloĆ© Zhao, 2025).  Honestly, Hudson has her moments in this story, especially in the later scenes, but I now see her as the least likely winner in this category, just as I can easily understand why this movie got no other nominations because, had I not known it’s based on a documentary also called Song Sung Blue (Greg Kohs, 2008; which you can get a summary of here [6:49 video] or watch the whole thing at this site) about the people depicted in the Brewer version, with the doc (which I haven’t had time to watch, if course) winning Jury and Audience awards at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, I would have found this to be too overly-sentimental to be interested in except for the enjoyment of Neil Diamond songs (loved his long-ago actual concert). 

 

 Basically, the situation here is long ago at the 1987 Wisconsin State Fair Don Ho imitator—who unsuccessfully demands to just perform as himselfMike Sardina (Hugh Jackman) meets up with equally-dissatisfied Patsy Kline impersonator Claire Stengl (Hudson), leading to a partnership including an ongoing Neil Diamond tribute and marriage. Their act proves quite popular within the Midwest until various tragedies take their toll (many more plot details are available at this site).  For me, Hudson’s generally overshadowed by Jackman for most of the movie, their singing’s commendable in that they both do it live, and, in general, I’m not terribly taken with what’s presented here (although both lead characters’ determination to overcome their major problems is quite commendable, with the CCAL response a bit stronger than mine as RT positives are 78%, MC average is 61%; if you’re interested turn to streaming where you’ll find $9.00 rentals at Amazon Prime Video, Apple TV, along with [unconfirmed by me] a freebee at Peacock [$10.99 monthly to subscribe]).  My Musical Metaphor will be the title song sung by Diamond (from his 1972 Moods album) with its lyrics appropriate for this movie: "Funny thing / But you can sing it with a cry in your voice / And before you know it gets to feeling good / You simply got no choice.”  Many seem to like Song … more than me, but for now "I'm [Not Quite] a Believer", as I don’t feel the Song … movie got down to the depths that I perceive the … Blue doc addressed about this couple's mega-miseries.


Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage.  If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.

 

If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

             

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

          

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 32,041.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):