Thursday, October 28, 2021

Dune [2021] plus Short Takes on Bergman Island, suggestions for TCM cable offerings, and a few other cinematic topics

"Dreams are messages from the deep."
(opening intertitle from the new Dune before even the WB logo)


Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) when they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.

              

                                Dune [2021] (Denis Villenueve)
                                        rated pg-13   155 min.


Opening Chatter (no spoilers): Given the enormous in-theater response to this latest incarnation of Dune—opened in 4,125 domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters (income details below), but its audience must be in the millions already, not even counting those like me who watched it via streaming on HBO Max (which, because of its stunning visuals and soundtrack is not the way most critics are encouraging your viewership, but I’d still prefer to limit my potential indoor exposure to the COVID variants possibly lurking in large, well-attended, indoor spaces)I certainly couldn’t avoid making it my lead review this week, even though I’m not as enthralled with it as a good many others are (I’ll get into that aspect of my response in just a bit, but it's a bit like finally seeing Stagecoach [John Ford, 1939] after watching decades of other westerns, then not being as impressed by it even though its elements have influenced so many that came along later).  If, somehow, you’re not familiar with this storyline it’s based on what’s become an iconic book by Frank Herbert in 1965, followed by his 5 sequels, which may someday find their way to the big screen given the obvious popularity of this opening salvo, but first the initial story needs a finishing-sequel because only the first half of the first book is covered by this version of Dune, as the sci-fi exploits of House Atreides in the far distant future to assume control of dangerous-but-essential-planet Arrakis are detailed in their battles with the former overlords, aided by the “shock and awe” of the devious Emperor’s battle-hardened-troops.  Also, in the Short Takes section I’ll take you to Sweden’s Fårö, or Bergman Island, so-called in honor of the famed filmmaker who lived/worked there, where a contemporary filmmaker couple have come, him to be honored by a local cinema society, her to continue working on a script that just won’t come together (similar to my struggle this time to find appropriate Musical Metaphors for each of these reviews).  Also in that section I’ll offer suggestions for some choices on the Turner Classic Movies channel (but too much extra text for line-justified-layout like you see here [Related Links stuff at each posting’s end is similarly-ragged], at least to be done by this burned-out-BlogSpot-drone—oh, tedious software!) along with my standard dose of some industry-related-trivia.


Here’s the trailer for Dune [2021]:

                   (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge it; activate 

                   that same button or use the “esc” keyboard key to return to normal size.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


What Happens: Unless you’ve recently read Herbert’s original Dune novel or, like the Mentats described just below, have a near-photographic memory of encountering it at some earlier time (I sure don’t; I read it decades ago [maybe some of the sequels, too; can’t recall] as well as saw the critically-lambasted-adaptation by David Lynch [1984] back during its original release but by now I remember almost nothing about either of them so, in a manner of speaking, I’m a fairly-blank-slate-viewer for encountering this latest cinematic version) you might benefit from reading this detailed synopsis—which will also give you further extensive background on the inspirations, intentions, and allusions of Herbert’s novel—as well as from watching this short video (5:15) which provides an overview of the Dune universe (with some brief notes on those 5 sequel-novels) without getting into spoilers about the current movie.  I’ll do my usual dance around such in my comments below, but given how much detail of this futuristic universe is crammed into the lengthy-running-time of this new Dune these just-noted-sources might also help fill in plot-content-gaps I’ve skipped over, attempting to convey the basic flow of this story without getting into a lot of background explanation about characters, related events, history of this far-off-evolution of what I assume to be how our universe might have changed in the many thousands of years from our era to what’s now being depicted here.


 In distant 10191 Padishah Emperor Shaddam Corrino IV orders House Atreides to leave Caladan, the water-dominated-planet they control, to take over dangerous-desert-planet Arrakis, the only source of highly-prized-spice which enhances human vitality/lifespan while also allowing the Guild navigators to conquer interstellar travel through “folding” space (there’s more about this in the book, not really addressed much in this movie despite how vital such a tactic is within this future era), ruled for the last 80 years by House Harkonnen (run by Baron Vladimir Harkonnen [Stellan Skarsgård, under a ton of fat makeup/costuming], his thuggish-nephew, Glossu Rabban [Dave Bautista], and their Mentat* Piter De Vries [David Dastmalchian]).  Despite the Baron’s seeming public anger at this demotion, the secret plan between him and the untrustworthy-Emperor is for the Baron’s forces, aided by the Emperor’s crack-combat-troops, the Sardaukar, to retake Arrakis in a coup to eliminate House Atreides, seen by the Emperor as dangerous for gaining too much power, prestige, popularity.


*In this futuristic universe all Artificial Intelligence is banned (even computers, which weren’t that ubiquitous in 1965 when Herbert wrote this origin book) so Mentats are people of extraordinary intelligence and personal memory who operate as sort of the “consiglieres” to these ruling "families."


 In cautious acceptance of their charge, Duke Leto Atreides (Oscar Isaac), his consort Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson), their son Paul Atreides (Timothée Chalamet), their weapons master Gurney Halleck (Josh Brolin), their swordmaster Duncan Idaho (Jason Momoa), their Mentat Thufir Hawat (Stephen McKinley), and Dr. Wellington Yuen (Chang Chen) head off to Arrakis where they find the departed Harkonnen have sabotaged some of the vital spice gathering technology, which makes it even harder to harvest the stuff because it’s also guarded by huge, vicious sandworms.  Another plot point is Paul is the latest in a long line of carefully-calculated-humans overseen by the Bene Gesserit sisterhood, of which Lady Jessica is a member, with their collective hope of bringing forth a powerful, universe-harmonizing-savior, the Kwisatz Haderach (yet another tale of a "Chosen One"), so Jessica’s been teaching her son some of the tactics of “Jedi mind control” (not what they call it, of course; they say “the voice,” but such similarities to Lucasworld are what I digress about at the end of this review’s next section).  Paul has dreams of a woman he doesn’t know along with disturbing visions of chaos, so Bene Gesserit Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam (Charlotte Rampling) gives him the difficult Gom Jabbar test (he surprises her, enduring the pain; see Related Links far below for Villeneuve’s analysis of this scene); she then asks Baron Harkonnen to spare Jessica (now pregnant) and Paul during the onslaught on Arrakis, to which he agrees.  However, Dr. Yeuh turns out to be a traitor to House Atreides during the coup in order to release his captured wife but he does implant a poison gas capsule in Leto’s mouth in an attempt to kill the Baron who escapes as Leto dies.  ⇒The Baron turns over spice production to Rabban, Jessica and Paul are captured by Harkonnens but escape to take refuge with the planet’s indigenous people, the Fremen, then are attacked by Sardaukar troops leading to another escape but in the process Idaho and some Fremen die.  Jessica and Paul then find the main Fremen tribe, led by Stilgar (Javier Bardem), where Paul meets/is attracted to Chani (Zendaya), the woman from (as well as of) his dreams, but Fremen Jamis (Babs Olusanmokum) objects so Paul has to kill him in a knife duel, then joins the Fremen in a move to repel the invaders although Paul worries about his dreams of violent conflict in his name.⇐


So What? The ongoing-axiom about adapting novels into cinema is that it’s a difficult task at best (even when based on a relatively short book, as with The Maltese Falcon [Dashiell Hammett, 1930; 217 pages] that can more-easily-translate into a standard 2-hr. movie [although the most famous adaptation of that one {John Huston, 1941; see farther below for an upcoming TCM cablecast of this seminal-detective-genre-narrative} runs only 101 min. so it does compress some] because of all that must be left out in bringing page to screen, although in my opinion the Huston … Falcon does a extremely-commendable job of staying faithful to the source material, but even there the ending’s changed in the movie allowing Sam Spade to seem more righteous ["When a man's partner is killed, he's supposed to do something about it. It doesn't make any difference what you thought of him. He was your partner and you're supposed to do something about it."] than how he’s depicted in the book’s final sceneyou should read it for yourself, but if you can’t wait, here’s a summary and analysis).  This adaptation-challenge certainly has been the case with Dune as evidenced by the difficulties Alejandro Jodorowsky faced in his attempts to make cinematic sense of Herbert's book in the 1970s (explored long after the fact in the documentary Jodorowsky’s Dune [Frank Pavich, 2013; review in our March 28, 2014 posting]), then Lynch’s much-maligned-version where he attempted to cram over 400 pages into a 137 min. movie (yet, he’d intended a 3-hr.-epic but Universal forced drastic cuts which likely had a lot to do with the negative critical response; it’s impossible to know how Jodorowsky’s vision would have been rated, yet he planned for a mammoth 10-14 hr. adaptation which might have been beyond anyone’s standard filmic-comprehension-skills).


 If you really want to fully indulge in all things Dune, though, you can read this summary of Lynch's movie (along with a lot more about it) or even watch it for yourself (see JustWatch here for options, including free streaming on HBO Max and a few others, rentals for $.99-$3.99 on many platforms including Amazon Prime, Apple TV+; yes, I know you’re going to say I should have watched it again myself for insights in this review [just as I probably should have again seen Ingmar Bergman’s Scenes from a Marriage {1973} in reference to what I’m reviewing just below, but those large blocks of time just don’t always make themselves available even to a retired guy like me when there’s viewing competition from the MLB playoffs {let’s go Atlanta Braves, even though I hate their fans “tomahawk chop” chant while still finding it a tad more tolerable than the Houston Astros cheating their way to a World Series win back in 2017; Astros and Braves now tied 1-1 in this year’s Fall Classic} and the opening of the Golden State Warriors NBA season {4-0 so far; yea, Steph Curry and company}]), but in lieu of that here's a video (14:57) comparing the Top 10 differences between Dune 1984, Dune 2021 (note: This contains Spoilers [and ads interrupt at about 3:40, 9:05, 13:20]).


 Although I can offer excuses for not bringing myself directly up to speed on Lynch’s iteration of Dune (Wait!  You didn’t expect me to re-read the book too, did you?) I can’t fully explain why I’m not as awestruck as many others have been about what Villeneuve’s accomplished in this long, expensive movie so I’ll turn to someone like Ty Burr (regular critic for The Boston Globewho echoes aspects of my sentiments, " ‘Dune’ is a gigantic, rumbling, otherworldly epic of a movie that’s slightly less than it seems, if only because it seems so huge. [… It] isn’t ‘Lawrence of Arabia in Space,’ but it comes pretty close, and I say that as someone who went in a doubter," although overall he’s more complimentary than me, while we both steer away from The New Yorker’s Anthony Lane who says One’s eye is at first dazzled, then sated, and eventually tired by this pitiless inflation of scale. And here’s the funny bit. On the same day that ‘Dune’ is released in cinemas, it will also be available, thanks to HBO Max and the wisdom of Warner Bros., on your TV. Nice plan, guys. It’s like trying to stuff a cornfield into a cereal box.”  (Both of them also address Wes Anderson’s newest, The French Dispatch [only in theaters, I probably won’t see it for now; Lane’s much more enthusiastic about it.])


 So, please keep in mind Dune’s not for everyone; you should at least read a partial summary of this new interpretation before investing a good bit of time (plus whatever it costs to attend a theatrical screening, although if you already subscribe to HBO or HBO Max you’re home free that TV way) in this story of palace intrigue which offers a lot of combat, in both training and warfare.  In deference, though, to those who insist this Dune should only be seen on a huge theatrical screen—augmented with a state-of-the-art sound system—to fully appreciate the stunning visuals (created by an army of computer artists, cinematography by Greig Fraser) and mesmerizing soundtrack (Hans Zimmer), I can see the validity of their arguments when imagining what this would have looked/sounded like beyond my 47” TV screen, but I still think it preserves its audiovisual-power in a less-than-fully-overwhelming-format for those who choose not to venture into indoor crowds.  Yet, I’m not as stunned as some say I should be possibly because through no fault of anyone associated with any aspect of Dune (certainly not Frank Herbert) as elements of this story from the mid-20th century have found their way so effectively into sci-fi/fantasy stories too-well-known in the ensuing decades (especially the Star Wars trilogies with their cruel Emperor, clandestine plots against the heroes, the long-lived-order of Jedi knights, the “new hope” of a savior to bring about “balance in the Force,” creatures akin to sandworms, etc.) it all seems repetitive to me, no matter how artfully executed.  I commend the filmmakers for a high-quality-production, but nothing beyond the skillful-cinematics really engaged me all that much.  Still, those who will be more enthralled than me might also enjoy this Easter Eggs/explained-ending video (15:27) with some mentions of events from the later books—but Spoilers about the plot of this current movie, for those who haven’t read that first novel.


Bottom Line Final Comments: The CCAL’s actively behind the new Dune with critics surveyed by Rotten Tomatoes (345 of them as I go to “press”) settling on a cluster of 84% positive reviews while the usually-more-restrained-folks at Metacritic (63 of them so far) deliver a 74% average score (quite supportive for them, actually, especially when only 12 of those reviews are what they call mixed, just 1 is negative so based on the scores their staff assigns to the reviews it often doesn’t take much  to bring down the MC average, especially in a case such as this one where 50 of those reviews are what they consider positive yet the ultimate average is barely enthusiastic).  There’s no doubt, however, as to the positive response of audiences as I noted up in my Opening Chatter comments far above as audiences worldwide have provided a hefty pile of financial support—$41 million domestically, $223.2 million globally thus far after just a brief time in releaseso it’s already well on its way to recouping costs ($165 million for production, probably another $100 million or so for distribution/marketing) before it’s even been out for a month, easily bringing the news (see Other Related-Cinema Stuff much farther below) that the (first of many?) sequel(s) has been approved, allowing us in 2023 to see the rest of the events from Herbert’s original Dune novel as Paul Atreides’ new powers and influences take on more universal aspects in this sprawling narrative.


 While that novel certainly provided Villenueve lots of plot material to work with in formulating his spectacular vision of this story stuffed with commentary on politics, religion, human needs and desires, I found the scope and complexity of it befuddled me for awhile in coming up with an appropriate Musical Metaphor to finish off this review’s meandering direction (well, what else do you expect?) until I finally turned to Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan who long ago provided me with the answer I was seeking in “I Dreamed I Saw St. Augustine” (on his 1967 John Wesley Harding album) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF-FY8rqA1I due to lyrics such as these "I dreamed I saw St. Augustine Alive as you or me […] Searching for the very souls Whom already have been sold ‘Arise, arise,’ he cried so loud In a voice without restraint ‘Come out, ye gifted kings and queens And hear my sad complaint No martyr is among ye now Whom you can call your own So go on your way accordingly But know you’re not alone’ " which speak to me of the crisis in House Atreides, the villainy in House Harkonnen, the need for an inspirational leader willing to be a martyr to help bring about justice and stability in this future universe, providing “a new hope” that none of the oppressed are truly alone; there’s also the connection to the influential early-Christian philosopher/theologian, St. Augustine, who wrote extensively about evil, guilt, and Original Sin, yet contrasted all of this misery to the salvation offered by the City of God.  Thanks, Bob, I think this works out very nicely.  Now on to a topic about a filmmaker whose understanding of God was often much more in question.

               

SHORT TAKES (spoilers also appear here)

                  

                        Bergman Island (Mia Hansen-Løve)
                                       rated R   113 min.


Married filmmakers Tony and Chris Sanders come to Fårö island, the former home of now-deceased Swedish cinema-master Ingmar Bergman, Tony to be lauded by a local society, Chris to continue working on a new script she hasn’t been able to finish so she tells him her story (which we see on screen as if it’s been produced), but he’s little help for her project even when she needs it the most.


Here’s the trailer:


          Before reading further, please refer to the plot spoilers warning detailed far above.


 The CCAL’s in solid support here too (RT 86% positive reviews, MC with an 82% average score [one of their highest of this year]), although it may be because—like its primary characters—there’s just too much enthrallment with the life and work of Ingmar Bergman to avoid being enamored by a story centered on the place, Fårö island, where this Swedish cinema legend lived much of his life, shot most of his films from the time of Through a Glass Darkly (1961) throughout the rest of his career.  What we get in … Island, though, is an odd mix of its primary story of noted genre writer/director (horror/sci-fi apparently, though we don’t get much detail on that) Tony Sanders (Tim Roth) and his more-independent-filmmaker wife, Chris (Vicky Krieps), on Fårö, primarily for him to be celebrated by a local cinema society (a bit odd such a group in ground zero of Bergman-mania would fete someone like Tony [unless they’re trying to consciously distance themselves from their famous former neighbor who died July 30, 2007, same day as another cinema-master, Italy’s Michelangelo Antonioni]) while she’s struggling to finish the script for her current project, hoping to pick up whatever inspiration she can from Bergman’s former surroundings (a local cottage industry on this island including a bus tour of landscape-sites where he shot many films, although there’s really not all that much to see outdoors as his powerful dramas usually took place mostly indoors).


 While there’s affectionate-connection between these spouses he’s consciously not much help with the screenplay, The White Dress, she’s struggling over (either because he doesn’t feel he’s the right person to offer advice on her concept or maybe he’s just not all that interested in it), she says she’ll do her writing in the windmill next to the house they’re staying in.  It doesn’t help too much they’re sleeping in the bed shared by Liv Ullman and Erland Josephson in Scenes from a Marriage (1973) before their characters’ union deteriorated (well, our couple’s landlady did remind them this was a film that launched countless divorces).*  Nor is Chris’ mood lightened (she also misses their little daughter June [Grace Delrue], staying on the mainland with Tony’s mother) by watching the heartbreaking Cries and Whispers (1972) in a nearby building that served as Bergman’s private screening room.  Further, Chris is a bit put off by all the fawning-adulation Tony’s getting at his screening/audience dialogue-event, so she slips away (forgoing the Bergman Safari bus with him), goes instead to the graveyard where Bergman’s buried, meets grad student Hampus (Hampus Nordenson)—also a Bergman fanatic—who takes her on a nice, personalized tour of Ingmar sites.


*Scenes … originally a Swedish TV miniseries (6 episodes, 282 min.), then condensed to a 168 min. theatrical film, which I’m still planning on seeing again at some point, post-World Series (with no fears of it instigating divorce) especially after having just watched the marvelous 2021 HBO 5-part-miniseries based on it (roughly same TV running time) with Jessica Chastain and Oscar Isaac.


 Next, Chris tells Tony (when he’s not distracted by phone calls) the details of her script so far in which former lovers Amy (Mia Wasikowska) and Joseph (Anders Danielsen Lie) end up on Fårö at the wedding of mutual friends (Amy agonizes over having brought only 1 formal dress, worried it’s not off-white enough to distract from the bride, finally wears something else), rekindle their passion (despite each being in another relationship), but he's overcome with guilt, leaves the island without telling her, leaving her despondent, which is as far as Chris has written at this point (but she does work Hampus into a brief purposely-melodramatic scene with Amy in a pub where she’s drunk, lamenting her situation while we hear ABBA’s "The Winner Takes It All").  Tony then goes to bring June to the island, Chris visits Bergman’s old home (Hampus is there, just leaving), she falls asleep, is awakened by Anders who goes with her to a nighttime wrap-party for her film, which apparently has been shot, finished parallel to what we’ve been watching (at least in Chris’s dream/ projection).  Next day, Tony’s back with June who’s glad to see Mom.  ⇐ Bergman aficionados (like me) will surely find much to like about this film (even though it’s only tangentially-related to him and his works, but it is photographed on Fårö), yet the main story doesn’t seem to connect all that much to what Chris is plotting (which we see actively on screen, not controlled by any voiceover-narration from her) until that concluding dinner scene and the following family reunion's true finale.


 If this situation interests you it still might be possible to find … Island in a domestic theater (89 of them, down from 115) where it’s taken in $113.2 thousand (worldwide $556 thousand) but more likely you’ll do as I did, streaming where Amazon Prime and others offer a $6.99 rental.  Harder for me than finding it or finally deciding what I thought of it (the structure’s a bit off-putting, but then so was [more successfully, I’d say] the meta-awareness of the filmmaking process in Persona [1966] or the actors talking directly to the camera about their characters in The Passion of Anna [1969], so there’s Bergman precedent here, although if you’re willing to make the investment in Bergman’s bleak visions I’d recommend any of his titles I’ve mentioned, along with The Seventh Seal [1957] and Autumn Sonata [1978] over Bergman Island) was finding a useful Musical Metaphor so I ultimately turned to The Beatles’ “There’s a Place” (U.K. debut 1963 album Please Please Me and U.S. debut album Introducing … The Beatles [released by Vee-Jay in early 1964, almost the same contents as  U.K. version, just before Capitol’s Meet the Beatles!]) at https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=vTsbYbN8VVI as they sing “There’s a place Where I can go When I feel low When I feel blue And it’s my mind And there’s no time when I’m alone […] In my mind there’s no sorrow Don’t you know that it’s so There’ll be so sad tomorrow Don’t you know that it’s so,” which speaks to me of Chris’ personal/professional dilemmas, finally resolved in her mind as well as elsewhere here.

          

Suggestions for TCM cablecasts


At least until the pandemic subsides Two Guys also want to encourage you to consider movies you might be interested in that don’t require subscriptions to Netflix, Amazon Prime, similar Internet platforms (we may well be stuck inside for longer than those 30-day-free-initial-offers), or premium-tier-cable-TV-fees.  While there are a good number of video networks offering movies of various sorts (mostly broken up by commercials), one dependable source of fine cinematic programming is Turner Classic Movies (available in lots of basic-cable-packages) so I’ll be offering suggestions of possible choices for you running from Thursday afternoon of the current week (I usually get this blog posted by early Thursday mornings) on through Thursday morning of the following week.  All times are for U.S. Pacific zone so if you see something of interest please verify actual show time in your area for the day listed.  These recommendations are my particular favorites (no matter when they’re on, although some of those early-day-ones might need to be recorded, watched later), but there’s considerably more to pick from you might like even better; feel free to explore their entire schedule here. You can also click the down arrow at the right of each listing for additional, useful info.


I’ll bet if you checked that entire schedule link just above you’d find other options of interest, but these are the only ones grabbing my attention at present.  Please dig in further for other possibilities.


Friday October 29, 2021


10:00 PM Night of the Living Dead (George A. Romero, 1968) Another of my periodic suggestions based not so much on cinematic quality but on cult-status, especially because it led to several sequels (all directed by Romero) and a remake of this original (Tom Savini, 1990), as well as inspiring a seemingly-never-ending glut of zombie movies into the present. It’s grotesquely gory at times, maybe the scariest thing I’ve ever seen, but with an even more chilling sociopolitical ending. Followed on TCM for the next 2 days in a Halloween marathon with a constant flow of actual horror movies (including 8:00 PM Saturday October 30, 2021 Frankenstein [James Whale, 1931], 8:00 PM Sunday October 31, 2021 Psycho [Alfred Hitchcock, 1960]) and not-really-horror movies (such as 9:30 PM Saturday October 30, 2021 the hilarious parodyYoung Frankenstein [Mel Brooks, 1974]).


Monday November 1, 2021


12:49 AM Metropolis (Fritz Lang, 1927) This one is a marvelous example of the dynamic, bold, consciously-exaggerated style of German Expressionism set in the future (2027!) where elites run society, workers toil as underground slaves to huge machines until the city leader’s son joins in a rebellion against the wealthy overlords (silent with intertitles and music). A strong influence on later classics of the futuristic sci-fi and horror genres with its massive sets and stunning special effects 

for this early time in the history of film. Let's hope TCM runs the most complete version available.


Tuesday November 2, 2021


12:30 AM West Side Story (Robert Wise and Jerome Robbins, 1961) One of the best musicals 

ever, adapted from a successful 1957 Broadway play, itself adapted from Shakespeare’s Romeo 

and Juliet, the rival families now being rival NYC street gangs as Jets Tony (Richard Beymer) falls 

for Sharks’ relative Maria (Natalie Wood) but the entrenched rivalries (Whites vs. Puerto Ricans) 

lead to tragedy. Huge Oscar winner: Best Picture, Director(s), Supporting Actor (George Chakiris), Supporting Actress (Rita Moreno), Film Editing, Scoring for a Musical, Sound, Art Direction, Cinematography, Costume Design (last 3 all for color films), Honorary Award to Robbins for his marvelous choreography, also highest grosser of ’61 (Pauline Kael hated it; she’s one of the few).


5:45 PM The Misfits (John Huston, 1961) In its own way a bit of a swan song for Old Hollywood, 

with script by Arthur Miller, direction by Huston, the final screen appearances of Marilyn Monroe 

and Clark Gable, one of the last by Montgomery Clift (Thelma Ritter and Eli Wallach are in there too), sort of a western but set in contemporary Nevada as interpersonal angst, drunkenness, desperation haunt the starring characters. A flop in its time, much more highly regarded today by the critics.


Wednesday November 3, 2021


8:00 PM The Maltese Falcon (John Huston, 1941) Some claim this started the troubled-crime-tradition of film noir: Humphrey Bogart as Dashiell Hammett’s streetwise-private-eye, Sam Spade, whose life gets complicated when the takes on Brigid O’Shaughnessy (Mary Astor) as a client searching for the priceless “black bird.”  A fabulous cast includes Peter Lorre, Sydney Greenstreet, Elisha Cook Jr.  Masterful “Hardboiled-detective” story with a sense of morality amongst greed.


If you’d like your own PDF of ratings/summaries of this week's reviews, suggestions for TCM cablecasts, links to Two Guys info click this link to access then save, print, or whatever you need.


Other Cinema-Related Stuff: Extra items for you: (1) Dune (now called Dune: Part 1) officially announced for 2023; (2) IATSE film/TV production union set for ratification vote on new contract.  As usual for now I’ll close out this section with Joni Mitchell’s "Big Yellow Taxi" (from her 1970 Ladies of the Canyon album)—because “You don’t know what you’ve got ‘till it’s gone”—and a reminder that you can search streaming/rental/purchase movie options at JustWatch.

              

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

                

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts.*  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage If you’d like to Like us on Facebook please visit our Facebook page. We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it!


*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.


Here’s more information about Dune [2021]:


https://www.dunemovie.com/ (click the 2 little bars in the upper right corner for more info)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoAA0sYkLI0 (17:33 director Denis Villeneuve breaks 

down the Gom Jabbar scene where Paul passes a crucial test [ad interrupts at 9:30]) 


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dune_2021


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/dune-2020


Here’s more information about Bergman Island:


https://www.ifcfilms.com/films/bergman-island


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGigo-lGZhc (18:37 interview with director Mia Hansen-Løve and actors Vicky Krieps, Anders Danielson Lie [I don’t know who the man on the far left is])


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/bergman_island_2021


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/bergman-island


Please note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow connect 

with us at that site in order to do it (most FB procedures are still a bit of a mystery to us old farts).


If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here please use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work (But if you truly have too much time on your hands you might want to explore some even-longer-and-more-obtuse-than-my-film-reviews-academic-articles about various cinematic topics at my website, https://kenburke.academia.edu, which could really give you something to talk to me about.)


If we did talk, though, you’d easily see how my early-70s-age informs my references, Musical Metaphors, etc. in these reviews because I’m clearly a guy of the later 20th century, not so much the contemporary world.  I’ve come to accept my ongoing situation, though, realizing we all (if fate allows) keep getting older, we just have to embrace it, as Joni Mitchell did so well in "The Circle Game," offering sage advice even when she was quite young herself.


By the way, if you’re ever at The Hotel California knock on my door—but you know what the check-out policy is so be prepared to stay for awhile (quite an eternal while, in fact).  Ken


P.S.  Just to show that I haven’t fully flushed Texas out of my system here’s an alternative destination for you, Home in a Texas Bar, with Gary P. Nunn and Jerry Jeff Walker.  But wherever the rest of my body may be my heart’s always with my longtime-companion, lover, and wife, Nina Kindblad, so here’s our favorite shared song—Neil Young’s "Harvest Moon"

—from the performance we saw at the Desert Trip concerts in Indio, CA on October 15, 2016 (as a full moon was rising over the stadium) because “I’m still in love with you,” my dearest, 

a never-changing-reality even as the moon waxes and wanes over the months/years to come. But, just as we can raunchy at times (in private of course) Neil and his backing band, Promise of the Real, on that same night also did a lengthy, fantastic version of "Cowgirl in the Sand"

(19:06) which I’d also like to commit to this blog’s always-ending-tunes; I never get tired of listening to it, then and now (one of my idle dreams is to play guitar even half this good).

But, while I’m at it, I should also include another of my top favorites, from the night before 

at Desert Trip, the Rolling Stones’ "Gimme Shelter" (Wow!), a song always “just a shot 

away” in my memory (along with my memory of the great drummer, Charlie Watts; RIP).

           

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

           

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 21,263 (as always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with our hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers); below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (with appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):


Thursday, October 21, 2021

The Last Duel plus a few Short Takes on suggestions for TCM cable offerings and other cinematic topics

Truth, Such a Fleeting Concept

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) when they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.


The Last Duel (Ridley Scott)   rated R   153 min.


Opening Chatter (no spoilers): Last weekend marked a pandemic-related-milestone for me as I actually went to a theater for 2 weeks in a row assuming that my Pfizer vaccinations along with a recent booster would protect me (plus there being only about 10 other people in the auditorium for a mid-afternoon-screening [I can see why theater-owners are still nervous even when something like Halloween Kills {David Gordon Green} surprisingly rakes in a whole lot of dough even while being simultaneously-available on Peacock streaming]) like in last week’s cautious venture out into my preferred-viewing-environment to see Daniel Craig’s farewell to James Bond in No Time to Die (Cary Joji Fukunaga; review in our October 14, 2021 posting).  While I wasn’t quite as impressed this time with The Last Duel, the combination of director Scott and primary male actors Matt Damon, Adam Driver, Ben Affleck (sorry, I’m not familiar with lead female Jodie Comer from BBC America’s Killing Eve; I can keep up with only so many TV series) plus a generally-generous-response from the CCAL compelled me to defy COVID-Delta once again to see what would become of this historically-based-tale of a noblewoman raped by a nobleman in 1386 France (with consistent denials on his part, consistent declarations from her even though death awaited whichever one of them was judged to be lying) told in 3 chapters from the various perspectives of the 2 already noted plus her husband.  We begin this multi-faceted-story with the men being locked into their armor as they prepare to battle to the ultimate finish, the woman also being dressed to be part of the huge audience witnessing this horrific public spectacle, then we shift into their separate narratives that will soon be detailed below.  


 In addition to the brutal, deadly duel there are also battle scenes between French vs. English or Scottish armies, so there’s little pleasant to watch here except the well-presented-explorations of the society of the time (how much have we transcended it where abuse of women is concerned?) in terms of the standard misogynistic attitudes toward a woman’s worth in the affairs of men (pun somewhat intended) vs. a specific woman who refuses to play by expected norms even as her own life’s at risk.  Also, in the Short Takes section I’ll offer suggestions for some choices on the Turner Classic Movies channel (but too much extra text for line-justified-layout like you see here [Related Links stuff at each posting’s end is similarly-ragged], at least to be done by this burned-out-BlogSpot-drone—oh, such tedious software!) along with that standard dose of industry-related-trivia.


Here’s the trailer for The Last Duel:

                   (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge it; activate 

                   that same button or use the “esc” keyboard key to return to normal size.)



If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


What Happens: This film’s adapted from Eric Jager’s novel The Last Duel: A True Story of Trial by Combat in Medieval France (2004)—itself based in historical accounts about the people to be described below (although the actual last sanctioned French duel occurred much later—1547—in which Guy Chabot de Jarnac triumphed over François de Vivonne who later died from those battle wounds [see here for details]).  After the brief opening scene noted above about the combatants and the wife who claimed rape being dressed for this brutal occasion, the duel begins with the men on horseback preparing to charge each other as we finally get the opening credits followed by the first of 3 chapters within this narrative, titled “The truth according to Jean de Carrouges" (Matt Damon).  Within his account (where we witness events as seemingly being told to us by each 1 of the 3 main characters, focusing on his/her specific viewpoint) he’s a brave soldier (technically a squire) eventually fighting for teenage King Charles VI (Alex Lawther) against the English, but we see him first in 1370 in combat alongside his close friend/fellow squire, Jacques Le Gris (Adam Driver), where Jean’s battlefield exploits are celebrated.  However, when the king’s cousin, Count Pierre d’Alençon (Ben Affleck) is named overlord of this sector of France the new near-despot demands settlement of overdue taxes de Carrouges (and others) can’t pay so he seeks a new wife (his previous one, and their child, died of the plague) with a hefty dowry, Marguerite de Thibouville (Jodie Comer); as the marriage proceeds, however, he’s shocked to find a particularly-desirable piece of land’s already been taken by Count Pierre, then given to Le Gris, setting up an intensifying-hostility.  


 In anger over this intentional humiliation, de Carrouges sues Count Pierre to acquire the land, an effort rejected by the king, the Count further sowing discord by appointing Le Gris to the Captaincy of a fort de Carrouges assumed he’d inherit after his father’s death.  Next, Jean’s abroad fighting in Scotland (where he’s knighted despite a battlefield defeat); he comes home only to go quickly to Paris to receive gold owed to him, then returns to find his wife in distress, finally admitting she’d been raped by Le Gris.  Aware he’d get no fair judgment from the Count, de Carrouges appeals to the king for a duel to the death with Le Gris, but it’s more about how he’s been violated (as his wife’s his property) than how she’s been humiliated so the challenge is made to justify Jean's public image.


 In “The truth according to Jacques Le Gris” we see Jean de Carrouges’ eventual-adversary as a man with a likewise-high-opinion of himself but seemingly concerned about others around him, attempting to be helpful when he can although he easily becomes disdainful of his former friend—especially in private conversations with arrogant Count Pierre, as these 2 semi-royal-rascals become increasingly close—whom we see Jean in this version as brutish, hot-tempered, a bit of an uncouth-embarrassment around the seemingly-more-refined-figures of d’Alençon’s court (where wine and debauchery flow in equal measure).  Le Gris is well-educated, shares a command of Latin with Count Pierre, gets the scrambled finances of his liege in order, is quite successful in collecting those outstanding debts so d’Alençon heaps praise and gifts upon Le Gris, including that prized piece of land so earlier desired by de Carrouges (taken from Marguerite’s father, Sir Robert de Thibouville [Nathaniel Parker] as part of his payment to the Count’s coffers).  Upon first meeting Marguerite (at an event attended by Jean and his wife in an attempt to publically smooth over the rising-bad-blood between the former close friends), Le Gris is attracted to her, feels he’s a much better match than her illiterate, uncouth husband, with seemingly-mutually-aroused-passion in Marguerite as we see her in a brief scene being directly seductive toward Le Gris then we cut to him waking up alone in bed sweating profusely.  Again, de Carrouges is off fighting for his king in Scotland ,but when he returns he gets into a public confrontation at an event with the Count when Le Gris fails to address Jean as ‘Sir,” seeming to be so foolish in this process according to Jacques’ cinematic-presentation.  


 Later, when Jean’s in Paris collecting his gold, Marguerite’s left alone in her home as her live-in mother-in-law, Nicole de Carrouges (Harriet Walter)—who clearly doesn’t care much for her son’s second wife, as they quarrel frequently—takes all the servants with her on some unspecified-errand—allowing Le Gris to trick his way into her dwelling, chases her up into the bedroom, rapes her but with the constant “justification” she really wants it, that their mutual attraction is so strong she’s not really been raped, although due to de Carrouges’ furious response upon returning home Le Gris quickly knows what trouble he faces so he calls upon Count d’Alençon to protect him at their level—constantly claiming he’s innocent of any rape charges anyway—but ultimately agrees to the king’s sanctioned-duel in order to save his honor.  (In a wicked scene, he confesses his sin to a priest only to be defended by this clergyman about the difficulty of men resisting seductive women since Eve.)


 The third chapter, “The truth according to Marguerite de Carrouges” (opening graphic clarifies the filmmakers’ intentions by then fading out all the words except “the truth”) gives us many additional scenes not as retold repeats from the first 2 versions: some making it clear how desperate Jean de Carrouges is for a male heir with his aggressive sex acts toward his wife where she seems to be nothing beyond a bodily-means to his desired end; others emphasizing incompatibilities between Marguerite and her mother-in-law; still others where Marguerite admits to an untrustworthy female friend Le Gris is attractive (but showing no interest in him) which will be used against her in the testimony before King Charles VI where there’s even an attempt to accuse Marguerite of not knowing who actually raped her, as if the event’s trauma scrambled her memory (the same attempted “defense” of now-Supreme Court-justice Brett Kavanaugh when charged with long-ago-sexual-assault by Christine Blasey Ford during his 2018 Senate confirmation process).  There are also attempts by “experts” at that Royal hearing to assert “scientific” certainty a woman cannot get pregnant unless she experiences the same level of pleasure as her husband during lovemaking (a tactful way in those days of referring to orgasm), thereby blaming her for not having produced an heir for Jean as well as the assertion a woman cannot get pregnant after being raped (by the time we get to the arguments about the need for the duel Marguerite is several months pregnant with no sure evidence of paternity)—the same sort of claim made in 2012 by Kansas U.S. Representative Todd Akin in his run for the U.S. Senate before he backtracked, still losing the election to Claire McCaskill.


 There’s also a sort of allegory scene where de Carrouges has purchased a prize mare with plans to make a fortune from selling her offspring but he’s horrified when an ordinary stallion gets loose, humps her before he can be stopped, impregnates her, alluding again to the idea of Le Gris ransacking his “property.”  In the rape scene by Marguerite it’s clear Le Gris is simply imposing his horny will upon her, even though her husband’s first response is an angry demand as to the truth of her charges rather than empathy for his wife, even as his attitude into the duel is more about how he’s been wronged by this assault more so than his spouse.  At the King’s hearing Le Gris continues to deny rape ever occurred while Marguerite is pressured to renounce her claims with the penalty of being burned at the stake as “God’s judgment” if her husband loses the duel; she refuses to relent.  ⇒At the battle between the 2 men they pound each other with lances, swords, other weapons, even fists as the outcome shifts when each gains fleeting advantage until a wounded Jean appears to lose, yet he lashes back, gains the upper hand.  After demanding Le Gris renounce his innocence to no avail, de Carrouges fatally stabs him, freeing himself and his wife from any taint of lying, with Le Gris’ body stripped, hung in public humiliation.  Bloody and battered, Jean’s still able to ride away (Marguerite behind him) to the cheers of the crowd.  In a last scene we see her a bit later with her young son, followed by final graphics telling us Jean died not long after the duel in a crusade against the Ottoman Empire while Marguerite continued to manage the family holdings, never remarrying.⇐


So What? How much of this tale is true, how much has been fictionalized is not something I can report except that its basic facts are accurate in terms of the growing enmity between Sir Jean de Carrouges and Jacques Le Gris, the rape charge by Marguerite de Carrouges (unique for this time for a woman to publicly defend herself this intently), and the result of the duel.  If you’d care to research the situation for yourself this site provides useful information about what became of the main characters in this narrative (including Count Pierre d’Alençon) after the events depicted in the film while this one offers an even-longer-account of those events, the aftermath, with many years going by allowing Le Gris’ claim of innocence to be more generally accepted even though nothing definitive exists in any clear evidence from the time it all occurred.  Certainly, this telling of the story is intended to defend Marguerite, brush aside any sense of her willing cooperation in the assault on her body, which seemed to be far too easy an assumption on the part of the men accusing her of defaming Le Gris (a favorite of the powers-that-be of this long-ago-time, although the sense that women often bring sexual assault on themselves through actions, dress, willing inebriation, saying “no” while implying “yes” is still all-too-common worldwide in our time) with the assembled-bloodlust-crowd watching the duel all too eager to cheer for whatever the result might be, rationalizing for themselves the Divine “acknowledgement” truth's confirmed, no matter the victor on the battlefield.


 On a more pragmatic level, this film does give us a physical sense of this ancient period (by our rapidly-built-and-rebuilt-cultural standards) in terms of dress, living quarters, attitudes among the mighty and the lowly, how important direct verbal communication was when there was nothing faintly resembling our contemporary news/attitude-sharing-technologies so that the status of the speaker of a given statement often was enough to confirm the veracity of what was said (especially where the king’s concerned) as even trials were dependent on the prerogatives of the judges (Hmm, how much has that changed either?  We can only hope for the best.), as with Count Pierre’s unquestioning loyalty to Le Gris despite the ongoing military support offered him by de Carrouges while Le Gris settled into aristocratic-sycophancy.  Maybe such “palace intrigue” isn’t so different today from back then, but, if so, at least this story shows how consistent are these certain aspects of human nature.


 One other thing many reviewers have noted is how … Duel shows us a structure akin to Akira Kurosawa’s international classic, Rashomon (1950), where we get the presentation of the same events from different perspectives of the people involved, in this case a question of what happened on a sultry day in medieval Japan as a samurai and his wife are traveling through the woods, accosted by a bandit, with the husband later found dead, the wife either raped or compliant with her attacker as conflicting testimony comes from each of these 3 (the deceased husband speaking through a medium) along with 2 other travelers who witnessed certain aspects of the events.  The main difference is that in Kurosawa’s masterpiece we never know for sure what happened because the conflicting accounts aren’t resolved whereas in The Last Duel there’s no question Marguerite was raped, with even Le Gris’ version modified only in his own mind as to her stated-protest/private-acquiescence with little evidence to back up his rationale of “she wanted it.”  As to whether you’d prefer to explore such an intriguing-experience of subjectivity in the 88 min. of Rashomon or the 153 min.-expansion of The Last Duel, you’ll have to decide for yourself; I think … Duel could have been cut considerably (did we really need the detail—and the gore—of several battle scenes?), although it’s longer-than-normal-presence may be an attempt to acknowledge what’s in the novel’s source material (I couldn’t begin to say) or a goal of giving each of the 3 “narrators” (implied here, not in the literal sense of Rashomon) sufficient evidence to state their separate cases rather than using a singular narrative more akin to Marguerite’s, yet it just feels to me to be too much exploration of a topic that could have been better condensed—of course, you could state that about this review also.


Bottom Line Final Comments: As with the CCAL’s internal split in last week’s posting about No Time to Die, once again we have the Rotten Tomatoes reviewers going strong with 86% positive reviews while the folks at Meteoritic hold back somewhat with a 67% average score (not too bad for them, yet not close to RT’s exuberance either), so this week I’m more with the MC results (there’s a lot to be interested in while The Last Duel evolves in its multi-perspective-manner, but especially with the first 2 chapters it gets a bit tiring watching mostly the same events but just with mostly-subtle-twists on how these male characters perceive themselves; ultimately, when we get to Marguerite’s version it became much more interesting, following a path with just a bit more extension could have been the entire film, although that would be the standard path, wouldn’t be as easily able to contrast her experience of these incidents to those of the 2 primary men in her adult life).  Audiences showed hesitancy toward it during its debut weekend with a soft opening of $5.2 million in domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters—3,065—with a global take of $9.4 million, but, even with this well-known, well-embraced cast, it’s hard for a medieval rape drama (even one where a lot of blood’s spilled) to compete with Agent 007 (… Die’s at $101.2 million domestically, $450 million worldwide after only 2 weeks) or the deadly Michael Myers’ return to slasherdom in Halloween Kills (I say “No thanks” because the original [John Carpenter, 1978] and Halloween H20 [Steve Miner, 1998] were enough of that sort of thing for me) debuting with $52.1 million domestically, $57.5 million globally.  If what you’ve read here about The Last Duel has intrigue for you, though, you’ll probably be able to sit far enough away from your screening-neighbors to keep COVID-Delta at bay at a moviehouse or check JustWatch in awhile for when it will come conveniently, probably cheaply, to home streaming.


 Normally, as I wrap up my reviews I use the device of a Musical Metaphor to offer a final, allusive comment on the cinematic subject, a situation where I'm usually able to come up with something reasonable in a short time, but for The Last Duel I just couldn’t find anything that seemed appropriate until I thought about Brian Wilson’s song (co-written with Terry Sachen, some lyrics changed by Mike Love) “Hang On to Your Ego,” the original version of what became “I Know There’s an Answer” on the 1966 Pet Sounds album.  However, for this song to work in the context of The Last Duel you have to misinterpret its references and intentions as I’d done for years until I read more about what Wilson had in mind with it.  Given lyrics like “They come on like they’re peaceful But inside they’re so uptight […] Hang on to your ego Hang on, but I know that you’re gonna lose that fight,” I thought the song was about self-centered jerks who would eventually lose their conceit, become more open-minded with encouragement from less-self-absorbed-friends; now I understand Wilson was using “ego” in Freudian terms as the reality-based aspect of our individual natures, the balancing point between the pleasure-principle id and the negative aspects (especially guilt) of the moralizing super-ego as he was concerned about casual LSD users losing touch with their own realities, simply swimming in a drug-induced-haze.  Well, with that in mind, let's go back to The Last Duel and any connection it might have to this pre-revision-Beach Boys-song, where you might could blend my misconceptions with Wilson’s intentions by seeing how difficult it is for either de Carrouges or Le Gris to let go of their self-justifying egos in telling their stories to enhance their individual status in late-14th century-France, so “what can you say [to open these minds] that won’t make them defensive”?  


 By contrast, we have Marguerite who’s learned to “Hang on to [her] ego” in a more positive manner, recognizing the self-serving attitudes of the important men who want to possess her for their own advantageous-reasons while she refuses to bow to the conventional demands of her medieval-society about renouncing her accusation of rape (dangerous as the final outcome of the duel may be for her, yet she remains steadfast, not “wast[ing] all [her] thoughts at night”).  Or, if all this song represents is my wrong interpretation it’s clear in The Last Duel that each of the male leads (along with Count Pierre d’Alençon) are misinterpreting themselves, none of them as noble, virtuous, or sincerely-respected as they see in their private mirrors, with Marguerite’s story available to us to help put them in less ego-driven (in the post-Freudian sense) perspective reminding us all of how we’re prone to manufacturing a persona that fits our needs even if it’s removed from the reality we create.

               

SHORT TAKES (an accurate statement for a change)

              

Suggestions for TCM cablecasts

                

At least until the pandemic subsides Two Guys also want to encourage you to consider movies you might be interested in that don’t require subscriptions to Netflix, Amazon Prime, similar Internet platforms (we may well be stuck inside for longer than those 30-day-free-initial-offers), or premium-tier-cable-TV-fees.  While there are a good number of video networks offering movies of various sorts (mostly broken up by commercials), one dependable source of fine cinematic programming is Turner Classic Movies (available in lots of basic-cable-packages) so I’ll be offering suggestions of possible choices for you running from Thursday afternoon of the current week (I usually get this blog posted by early Thursday mornings) on through Thursday morning of the following week.  All times are for U.S. Pacific zone so if you see something of interest please verify actual show time in your area for the day listed.  These recommendations are my particular favorites (no matter when they’re on, although some of those early-day-ones might need to be recorded, watched later), but there’s considerably more to pick from you might like even better; feel free to explore their entire schedule here. You can also click the down arrow at the right of each listing for additional, useful info.


I’ll bet if you checked that entire schedule link just above you’d find other options of interest, but these are the only ones grabbing my attention at present.  Please dig in further for other possibilities.


Saturday October 23, 2021


8:15 PM Unforgiven (Clint Eastwood, 1992) For me, the best western ever even as it deconstructs aspects of the genre partly established by Eastwood in earlier movies, about an old, reformed killer (Eastwood), failing as a pig farmer, accepting the reward-offering-task (along with Morgan Freeman, Jaimz Woolvett) of killing 2 cowboys who cut up a whore in Big Whiskey, Wyoming, a town run by 

an egotistical, brutal sheriff (Gene Hackman) where another gunman (Richard Harris) is also on the hunt. Features the famous line of Eastwood to Hackman, “Deserve’s got nothing to do with it,” just before blowing his head off. Oscars for Best Picture, Director, Supporting Actor (Hackman), Film Editing (Joel Cox), plus nominations for 5 others including Best Original Screenplay, Best Sound.


Sunday October 24, 2021


2:30 PM North by Northwest (Alfred Hitchcock, 1959) One of Hitchcock’s top success (that’s saying 

a lot) about a case of mistaken-identity gone terribly wrong as smug ad executive Roger Thornhill (Gary Grant) is thought to be a U.S. spy, hunted by thugs working for an evil foreign agent (James Mason).  A marvelous collage of great scenes including the crop-duster-in-the-cornfield attack; also stars Eve Marie Saint, Leo G. Carroll, Martin Landau. Great overall combo of tension and laughs.


11:00 PM La Strada (Federico Fellini, 1954) Cinema masterpiece, shows Fellini’s roots in cinematic Neorealism as he moves toward the realm of Lyrical Realism (before his full shift into Modernism). Story of a brutish strongman circus performer (Anthony Quinn) who buys a woman (Giulietta Masina) from a poor family to be his assistant, treats her badly, is violent toward a tightrope walker (Richard Basehart) who tries to befriend her. Superb acting. Won the Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film.


Monday October 25, 2021


3:00 PM The Rules of the Game (Jean Renoir, 1939) #3 of my All-Time Top 10 (#1 Citizen Kane [Orson Welles, 1941], #2 Persona [Ingmar Bergman, 1966]) by one of the great Realism directors (grand deep-focus cinematography; Renoir also plays Octave in the film) with a satire (plus dramatic aspects) of superficial values of the French aristocracy on the verge of WW II (banned in France even before Nazis marched in for “undesirable influence over the young”). Centers on the several affairs of a wealthy Marquis, his wife (with a famous pilot), as well as her flirty maid (with a poacher).


If you’d like your own PDF of the rating/summary of this week's review, suggestions for TCM cablecasts, links to Two Guys info click this link to access then save, print, or whatever you need.


Other Cinema-Related Stuff: IATSE TV and film production personnel may still vote to strike.  As usual I’ll close out this section with Joni Mitchell’s "Big Yellow Taxi" (from her 1970 Ladies of the Canyon album)—because “You don’t know what you’ve got ‘till it’s gone”—and a reminder that you can search for very many streaming/rental/purchase movie options at JustWatch.

           

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

            

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts.*  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage If you’d like to Like us on Facebook please visit our Facebook page. We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it!


*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.


Here’s more information about The Last Duel:


https://www.20thcenturystudios.com/movies/the-last-duel 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcB5BIOk_qo (4:48 interview with director Ridley Scott and actor Jodie Comer) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD_KVAR021s (6:10 interview with actors Ben Affleck and Matt Damon who are also co-screenwriters for this film along with Nicole Holofcener); sorry that I didn’t see anything with Adam Driver to add his comments to these links.


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_last_duel_2021


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/the-last-duel


Please note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow connect 

with us at that site in order to do it (most FB procedures are still a bit of a mystery to us old farts).


If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here please use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.  (But if you truly have too much time on your hands you might want to explore some even-longer-and-more-obtuse-than-my-film-reviews-academic-articles about various cinematic topics at my website, https://kenburke.academia.edu, which could really give you something to talk to me about.)


If we did talk, though, you’d easily see how my early-70s-age informs my references, Musical Metaphors, etc. in these reviews because I’m clearly a guy of the later 20th century, not so much the contemporary world.  I’ve come to accept my ongoing situation, though, realizing we all (if fate allows) keep getting older, we just have to embrace it, as Joni Mitchell did so well in "The Circle Game," offering sage advice even when she was quite young herself.


By the way, if you’re ever at The Hotel California knock on my door—but you know what the check-out policy is so be prepared to stay for awhile (quite an eternal while, in fact).  Ken


P.S.  Just to show that I haven’t fully flushed Texas out of my system here’s an alternative destination for you, Home in a Texas Bar, with Gary P. Nunn and Jerry Jeff Walker.  But wherever the rest of my body may be my heart’s always with my longtime-companion, lover, and wife, Nina Kindblad, so here’s our favorite shared song—Neil Young’s "Harvest Moon"

—from the performance we saw at the Desert Trip concerts in Indio, CA on October 15, 2016 (as a full moon was rising over the stadium) because “I’m still in love with you,” my dearest, 

a never-changing-reality even as the moon waxes and wanes over the months/years to come. But, just as we can raunchy at times (in private of course) Neil and his backing band, Promise of the Real, on that same night also did a lengthy, fantastic version of "Cowgirl in the Sand"

(19:06) which I’d also like to commit to this blog’s always-ending-tunes; I never get tired of listening to it, then and now (one of my idle dreams is to play guitar even half this good).

But, while I’m at it, I should also include another of my top favorites, from the night before 

at Desert Trip, the Rolling Stones’ "Gimme Shelter" (Wow!), a song always “just a shot 

away” in my memory (along with my memory of the great drummer, Charlie Watts; RIP).

           

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

            

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 21,263 (as always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with our hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers); below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (with appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):