Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Apex plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

Danger on the Rocks (shaken, not stirred)

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, though better options may be coming soon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.


           Apex (Baltasar Kormákur)   rated R    96 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


WHAT HAPPENS: We begin with intrepid mountain-climbing couple Sasha (Charlize Theron) and Tommy (Eric Bana) attempting to scale Norway’s treacherous Troll Wall when he tells her he’s tired of such demanding adventures (she’s not), then makes an unexpected exit when he slips, she can’t carry his weight, so she has to let him go in a fall to his death.  Then, 5 months later in tribute to him she goes to Australia’s Wandarra National Park to run the rapids in her kayak even though a ranger (Aaron Pedersen) says it’s a dangerous place for a lone traveler as there have been a lot of disappeared folks over recent years, but she moves on anyway.  At a gas station she’s harassed by 2 local hunters (Matt Whelan, Rob Carlton) until another guy, Ben (Taron Egerton), sends them away, then gives her a tip on where to start her journey.  The next day she maneuvers the rapids well, camps overnight, finds her backpack missing the next morning.  She continues down the river, comes upon Ben’s camp where he offers her some food and supplies, but also tells her he knows who she is, he’s the one who stole her bag (he gives it back), then pulls out a crossbow and starts a song on a boombox, telling her she’s got until the end of the song to try to get away from him.  She’s back on her kayak for awhile but falls out of it, runs along the riverbank with Ben in pursuit, occasionally shooting arrows at her, until she stumbles into a bear trap.  He opens the trap, takes her captive, then they go to a cave where bodies of those missing people hang (all dead now) because he’s fascinated by some lore of ingesting a person’s spirit by eating their liver (yes, that's an allusion to Hannibal Lector, as if we need anything more scary to be disturbed by in this eerie plot).  

 

 As she pretends to be close to him she bites off his ear, frees herself from her leg shackles, runs away, him in pursuit until a steep drop knocks him unconscious so she works on trying to remove her hand shackles until he revives, they struggle, she manages to damage his leg with a rock.  She convinces him they must go up the rock walls to escape this canyon, her climbing, him pulled up in a harness so he unlocks the handcuffs.  As she nears the top, hauling him part way up she loosens his rope so he falls to his death, allowing her to move past her ongoing guilt about letting Tommy fall.  She makes it to the top, hails down a passing car, tells everything to the ranger.  Later, she goes to the ocean to throw away Tommy’s beloved compass as she’s about to face the next phase of her life.⇐  (I’ve given you all the essentials, but if you want a bit more plot detail you can visit this site.)

 

SO WHAT? For these last 3 postings I’ve found my suggestion for something to see, then write about in The Week magazine (a publication I highly recommend for its summary coverage of national, international, entertainment, food, housing, tech topics), with my following those blurbs leading to some unusual cinematic experiences but with minimal OCCU response (Outcome [Jonah Hill] Rotten Tomatoes 31%, Metacritic 37%, me considerably more generous with 3 of 5 stars; Balls Up [Peter Farrelly] RT 26%, MC 34%, me even more generous with 3½ stars) so these choices weren’t disasters from my perspective, although I could easily see many might have faint interest in them.  This week’s choice, though, managed to get into CCAL territory (details in the next section below) with me and my wife, Nina, finding it even better than the scores from the critical establishment.  Nina calls it “gripping,” which relates well to the flow of the film’s plot while also being an unintentional pun on Sasha’s determined climbing up difficult rock walls at the beginning and end of this story (I have to wonder how much of what we see on screen is actually being done by Theron, what was the work of stunt doubles [no credits to such that I’ve seen] and/or what has been enhanced with computer graphics where there is acknowledgement given); no matter how these images came to be, though, they’re heart-stopping as Sasha carefully finds tiny crevices as crucial bare hand and foot holds to allow her desperate journeys up along these seemingly-sheer surfaces.  

 

 There’s little complexity to keep up with or become narratively-challenged here as the story clearly unfolds in a properly-structured, taut running time, with much of the imagery devoted to Sasha’s fearless handling of the swirling rapids or slowly, carefully making her way up those unforgiving rock walls so there’s lot of reason to be impressed with her wilderness skills, even in her various escape attempts.  At the other end of a spectrum of human personality attraction, Ben’s demented focus on self-sufficiency at all costs makes him an effective cold-blooded villain, easy to hate/be fearful of.  You may feel uncomfortable in those scenes of Sasha bound in various ways with her intended demise always on the verge of execution, yet she constantly proves herself capable of preventing Ben’s plan of simply adding her to his long list of overpowered victims.  If you’d like to explore a bit deeper about this film, go here (7:04 video, Spoilers of course) or you'll find even more at this site.


BOTTOM LINE FINAL COMMENTS: As noted above, the CCAL’s considerably more supportive of Apex than they were of Outcome and Balls Up, with the Rotten Tomatoes positive reviews at 65%, the Metacritic average score at a more-usual for them lower result of 57%; as also noted above, I found all of these to be more worthwhile than did the critical establishment, especially Apex, which you’ll be able to find only on Netflix where it’s free to subscribers or you can sample their catalogue for a month for $8.99 (with ads) or $19.99 (no ads, my choice).  If you’d like to see some agreement with my (humbly-noted always insightful) opinion, here’s John Anderson of The Wall Street Journal (whose 80% MC score matches my 4 of 5 stars): It will prove a literally breathtaking adventure, depending on one’s phobias about heights, water and psychopaths. But it is an ordeal saga, a predator thriller with horror-film accents—and a considerable amount of violence and pain for the character played by the ageless Ms. Theron, who may be giving the most athletically demanding performance of her action-movie career.  More like the CCAL averages is Guy Lodge (MC 70%) in Variety: For this is, at heart, a proudly pleasurable B-movie lavished with the benefits of A-movie craftsmanship […] it’s a happy throwback to a time when more junk-food cinema got to look and sound and feel this good, albeit on a far bigger canvas.”  (It is very visually-dynamic.)


 But, you can always count on contrarians like Stephanie Zacharek (MC 50%) of Time: Apex is efficiently made, and Theron is such an assured performer that she doesn’t allow the audience to linger unduly on Sasha’s suffering. But Apex fails to work either as a vehicle for sick thrills or an excuse for lots of feminist butt-kicking. Ben’s twisted misogynist savagery is exhausting from the start. It’s a wonder he doesn’t die in the movie’s first half, struck down by the deafening clatter of our collective eye rolling.”  Choose to watch or just sing along with my Musical Metaphor about Sasha’s ordeals with Ben, The Doors’ "Riders on the Storm" (1971 album L.A. Woman)—which I’ve used 9 times before, as lyrics like “There’s a killer on the road / His brain is squirmin’ like a toad […] If you give this man a ride / Sweet memory will die” give you a sense of the wealth of miserable situations I’ve encountered up on the screen.  Maybe next week’s offering will be of a more pleasurable nature.

          

SHORT TAKES

             

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage.  If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.

 

If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

               

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

              

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 71,591.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):


Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Balls Up plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

Condoms: They’re Not Just For Sex Anymore

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, though better options may be coming soon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.


             Balls Up (Peter Farrelly)   rated R    104 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


WHAT HAPPENS: Elijah DeBell (Paul Walter Hauser), product designer, and Brad Lewison (Mark Wahlberg), crack salesman, work for Regal Blue Condom Co. hoping to become an official sponsor of the 2025 World Cup with Elijah’s new invention—covers the testicles along with the penis.  Their pitch to Brazil’s Senhor Santos (Benjamin Bratt) goes so well that not only do they get the contract but also during the celebration Santos drops his 9 years of sobriety for booze, drugs, and a naked balcony jump, resulting in Santos’ firing by Brazil’s president, a cancelled contract, financial woes for Regal Blue, firing for Brad and Elijah.  However, 3 months later long-ago arranged packets for Brad and Elijah arrive, giving them tickets to the World Cup Final of rivals Brazil and Argentina, first class air to Rio de Janeiro, where at the match they’re drunk, Elijah’s mad about a rival condom company’s sponsorship, misinterprets an inflatable linguica mascot as a penis from the rival, runs onto the field to attack it (followed by Brad), resulting in a failed Brazil goal as Argentina wins 1-0.  (What?  No penalty kick?)  When in jail our boys reject Public Defender efforts of Antonia (Daniela Melchior), then are surprisingly released by Minister of Defense Cristos (Luciano Szafir) only to be attacked on the streets by angry Brazilians, saved by now-cabbie Santos, taken by thugs of drug lord Pavio Curto Bundchen (Sasha Baron Cohen) who hates soccer (sorry, fútbol)  but wants to use those condoms as cocaine smugglers if they can be swallowed; Brad and Elijah must oblige.

 

 As Pavio’s wife, Emilia (Eva De Dominici), seduces Brad to anger/stimulate her husband there’s an attack on the compound so our guys escape into the jungle where they pass their cocaine condoms, only to be met by an alligator who eats the drugs, dies.  Next, Brad and Elijah meet a group of U.S. ex-pat eco-warriors who welcome them warmly until surveillance footage shows the death of the gator, forcing our guys to flee on a small raft.  The next hurdle comes from tiny vampire fish, attracted to human urine, with one finding its way into Brad’s penis as he pees over the side of the raft, with Elijah having to make an uncomfortable extraction.  They’re caught by Cristos, but he lets then go again, just because a little farther downstream they’ll go over an enormous waterfall.  Using inflated condoms they survive the descent but face armed soldiers; the good news (finally) is they’re all now in Argentina (Antonia’s in the squad; turns out she was a spy in Brazil, really named Isadora Costa) where our guys are celebrated as heroes due to the World Cup victory, so they become men of honor even as their condoms become a national product of Argentina.  (I think my late Argentine friend/colleague, Dr. Mario Cavallari, would have found this silliness to be hilarious.)  I can’t lead you to more plot details, but this site offers further background information.


SO WHAT? My recent, post-Oscars decision to limit my ongoing reviews to whatever I can find on streaming of 2026 releases has recently resulted in some less-than-ideal choices, such as last week’s posting about Outcome (Jonah Hill), exploring Hollywood insider problems, with a plot that doesn’t have much of an outcome—even though I still found it more interesting than did the overall OCCU—and this week leaves me with a raunchy comedy that left our (me and Nina) regular viewing partner saying this is either the worst movie he’s ever seen or he has a decidedly-different sense of humor.  Nevertheless, despite another OCCU emphatic rejection (more details just below), I did find Balls Up to have enough humor I could respond to, allowing me to at least appreciate it better than Outcome even though my critical brethren could hardly agree with me less.  Maybe I’m just giving the director (and screenwriters here Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick) more credit than they deserve because I still have strong memories of hilarity in There's Something About Mary (Peter and Bobby Farrelly, 1998)—with marvelously-idiotic performances by Ben Stiller, Cameron Diaz, Matt Dillon—another borders-on-tasteless comedy but one that pulled in a much-more encouraging CCAL response (Rotten Tomatoes 84%, Metacritic 69%), doubly-better than their opinion of Balls Up.  So, I guess until such fare as Project Hail Mary (Phil Lord, Christopher Miller) and The Drama (Kristoffer Borgli) finds its way to my Roku device I’ll just have to keep looking for the best things I can find for you, with hopes the results are a bit better than these limited movies I’ve recently found.  

 

 Nevertheless, if the sort of comedy where a dangerous little fish partially makes its way into a man’s penis and his friend has to pull it out with his teeth appeals to you, Balls Up may be a lot more satisfying that the critical establishment would have you believe about it.  One final note here is that if your memory seems to be failing you, the 2025 World Cup Final (won by Chelsea over Paris Saint-German) took place in the USA, had nothing to do with Brazil and Argentina, and shouldn’t be confused with the 2026 World Cup which will occur this summer with matches again in the USA (depending on whatever crazy difficulties President Trump may come up with if he’s managed to slither out of his war with Iran by then) but also in Canada's and Mexico's North American locations.

BOTTOM LINE FINAL COMMENTS: You won’t find much enthusiasm for Balls Up from the OCCU: Rotten Tomatoes positive reviews are at the near-dismissal level of 26% and Metacritic average score is surprisingly-higher at 34% (just 8 reviews so far, though; maybe check back later).  As an example of those who found this movie barely worth their time to watch is Frank Scheck (MC 40%) of The Hollywood Reporter who says: "It’s a genre that has fallen out of favor at the box office, which doesn’t seem surprising considering that the sight and sound of Jeff Daniels uncontrollably pooping [Dumb and Dumber  {Peter and Bobby Farrelly, Bennett Yellin, 1994}] are not things that need to be experienced in premium formats. Hence this film premiering not in theaters but on Prime Video, and not being screened in advance for the press. […] this is a film that could really have used the manic energy of a Jack Black or Jim Carrey. Instead of feeling gleefully transgressive, it comes across as just another streaming-era time-filler.”  You'd be able to find many reviews of this type, yet, there are others (including me) who don’t find it that awful, such as Andrew Lawrence (MC 60%, equates to my 3 of 5 stars) of The Guardian (U.K.) who counters the many naysayers with these thoughts: “Prime Video at the very least should have given it the chance to stand on its own merits in a theatrical release – where, one suspects, this ribald delight would have had little trouble finding an audience, especially among football fans looking for an escape from the doom and gloom the host nation has brought to this year’s tournament. […] juvenile entertainment, handled by professionals. No, Paul Wernick and Rhett Reese, the scriptwriters, can’t resist the low-hanging fruit, down to the literal bananas. But as with their Deadpool work, they layer it with compounding stakes, spicy dialogue and characters with no sense of their own humor.”  I agree.

 

 As noted by Lawrence, if you want to indulge in this bucket of bawdy humor you’ll need to turn to streaming where it’s free to Amazon Prime Video subscribers (or, if not, you can get a 30-day free trial, then pay $13.98 [cheaper than a couple of theater tickets] per month for as long as you’d like to explore their extensive collection).  While you’re deciding about those choices you can listen to my usual review-ending device of a Musical Metaphor, this time Creedence Clearwater Revival’s "Run Through the Jungle" (1970 hit, on Cosmo’s Factory album) in reference to Brad and Elijah’s final cluster of challenges (with the song actually about gun control, not the frequent interpretation of being an anti-Vietnam War statement): “Woah, thought it was a nightmare / Lord, it’s all so true / They told me, don’t go walkin’ slow/ The Devil’s on the loose.”  My link to the original recording comes from when John Fogerty was still in the group (he left in 1972), but if you want something with more instrumental breaks (twice as long), here’s the 1998 version from (nicely ironic) Buenos Aires.

          

SHORT TAKES

                    

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage.  If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.


If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

           

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

               

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 71,591.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):