Thursday, November 20, 2025

Kiss of the Spider Woman [2025] plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

A Tangled Web of Conflicting Intrigues

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, but better options are on the horizon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue below [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.


11/20/2025: Due to a big variety of upcoming conflicts for me including Thanksgiving preparations and the annual indulgence by Nina and me in The Godfather trilogy, Film Reviews from Two Guys in the Dark will be dark next week but will return in early December.


        Kiss of the Spider Woman [2025] (Bill Condon)
                                 rated R   128 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red. OK, now continue on if you prefer.


WHAT HAPPENS: Argentina, May 1983, during the harsh military dictatorship of the Dirty War political prisoner Valentin Arregui Paz (Diego Luna) is joined in his prison cell by gay window dresser Luis Molina (Tonatiuh), convicted of public indecency, who soon finds dedicated revolutionary Valentin to have nothing in common with him (except they’re both male, although Molina wants to be a woman further angering Valentin); finally, to help distract from the misery of his situation Valentin agrees to listen to Molina’s recitation of his favorite Hollywood musical, also called Kiss of the Spider Woman (Valentin doesn’t like this genre either, seeing it as cheap escapism for the deluded masses), starring Latina spitfire Ingrid Luna—La Luna (Jennifer Lopez)—as Aurora, bored publisher of South America’s top fashion magazine until she meets Armando (also played by Diego Luna, just as her closeted gay assistant, Kendall Nesbitt, is another role played by Tonatiuh), a famous photographer, who invites her to accompany him back to the near-jungle village where they were both born.  (Molina’s movie is active and colorful, like the lavish 1940s musicals it alludes to, in contrast of color, lighting, and character attitudes to the sad prison cell of Molina and Valentin.)


 The Aurora story comes and goes as Valentin becomes more interested, but the main plot twist is Molina was purposely put in this cell in hopes he could befriend tight-lipped Valentin to reveal anything about his comrades and their plans, yet even though a friendship does grow between the men Valentin keeps his info to himself to protect both of them except he admits he has a lover on the outside, Marta (also Lopez), who he’s struggling to be comfortable with as she’s still within the bourgeoisie.  Both men are separately fed poisoned food, but their resolve is maintained even as the warden allows a fine box of edibles to be delivered so they share a feast.  In the movie we find Aurora and Armando in love, but their village is protected by the deadly Spider Woman (her kiss brings death) in exchange for an annual sacrifice of a woman’s lover; they visit her (Lopez again) where Armando is to be her victim until Kendall suddenly sacrifices himself instead.  Back in the prison Molina is freed in hopes he’ll accidently lead police to Valentin’s buddies, so the night before he leaves the 2 men have sex.  Valentin does tell Molina some info to share in a phone call which he does, leading to him being joined by a Valentin associate; suddenly they have to run from soldiers with Molina shot by other Valentin folks who mistakenly think he led the heat to them as they drive away (as he dies Molina has a brief dream of himself with Valentin, then the Spider Woman).  Valentin’s grief-stricken when he learns of Molina’s death in a newspaper left in his cell, but by October the junta’s overthrown, Valentin and many others finally freed from their cruel captivity.⇐


SO WHAT? This latest rendition of Kiss of the Spider Woman is adapted from a musical stage play of the same name from 1992 (book Terrence McNally, music John Kander, lyrics Fred Ebb, winning Tony awards for Best Musical, Score, and Lead Actress Chita Rivera [Kander and Ebb also provided the songs for the stage versions of Cabaret in 1966—adapted to cinema by Bob Fosse in 1972, winning several Oscars—and Chicago in 1975—adapted to cinema by Rob Marshall in 2002, winning the Best Picture Oscar]), itself adapted from the original Miguel Puig novel1 from 1976 with Puig himself adapting his unique book to a stage play (1982)—all of these using this same title.


1Puig's unusual novel is a fascinating book which you might want to explore sometime with the warning that it’s in a Modernist style with no narrator, just chapters mostly of dialogue forcing you to determine from context who’s speaking when, along with police reports on Molina, and extensive, lengthy reality-based footnotes resembling my previous academic articles (more on that just below).


 But wait!  There’s additional distracting stuff from me to fill up your day, so read on ... and on ... .2 

          

2Further, there is a marvelous 1985 film adaptation from Puig’s book (although I’ve never seen either of the stage versions to compare it to), also (of course) called Kiss of the Spider Woman (Hector Babenco), for which William Hurt won the Best Actor Oscar; as with the 2025 ... Spider Woman and both plays only one of Molina’s recalled movies finds its way into the 1985 film, even though in the book he recounts 6 of them, with a brief fever-dream by Valentine (Raul Julia) in which he imagines himself free and healthy with Marta, there played by Sonia Braga who also appeared briefly as the Spider Woman (in a short recitation by Molina) and as the WW II French Resistance woman, Leni Jamaison, seen extensively in Molina’s telling of a Nazi propaganda movie where she falls in love with a Nazi military officer, tragically dies.  Years ago, when I was writing more serious academic journal articles I did an extensive study of the 1985 film focusing on the impact of leaving out all the other Molina movies except the Leni story.  I can’t attach the PDF version of it here, but if you do a search for Ken Burke, “Adapting Kiss of the Spider Woman: Every Picture Tells a Story” in the Journal of Visual Literacy January 2010 (Volume 29, Number 2) pp. 106-128 you can find it at this site; however, you’ll also find that unless you work at a college with a library subscription to this journal you’d have to pay $56 to buy a download copy of it; yet (and please don’t tell the nice folks at the JVL, who were supportive enough to publish several of my writings including some listed in the References of the "Adapting Kiss …" article), you can download a free copy of it at this site, which should either provide further background for the 2025 film or serve as a sleep aid.


 I must admit when I found this latest version of ,,, Spider Woman to be a musical (not knowing then it was taken from such a structure on the Broadway stage) I was skeptical this intense tale of social ostracization and political repression could tolerate the addition of music (“I’ve been poisoned / Oh me, oh my / Just my luck / I’m gonna die.”).  But I should have remembered that musicals can incorporate song and dance in conjunction with weighty subjects, as I know from Cabaret, Chicago, and their marvelous predecessor, West Side Story (Robert Wise and Jerome Robbins, 1961)winner of 11 Oscars including Best Picture, Director, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Adapted Screenplay (after all, even if you take the music away you still have Romeo and Juliet)—all of which show how musicals can be successfully connected to serious themes.  I was relieved to see that the musical numbers in the new ... Spider Woman are mostly within Molina’s movie about Aurora or a few instances when he (or Valentin) share a fantasy with La Luna (a few numbers that take literal place within the prison have eliminated [Thank you, Mr. Condon.] while a few new ones have been added to the stage play’s collection).  Ultimately, the music—while it’s not as overwhelming to me as are many of the numbers in the musicals I’ve just cited—either underscores the intended difference between the movie musical and the miserable existence Molina and Valentin endure in prison or shows how La Luna serves as a role model for Molina, giving him hope he could someday at least impersonate the superbly-attractive feminine qualities he finds in her.  More importantly, this new film successfully retains what I find so effective in Barbenco’s 1985 film as Molina and Valentin overcome their distances, form an enduring bond.  If, like Valentin (and me, much of the time) you’re not enthused by musicals you might prefer to simply ignore Condon’s version in favor of a visit to Barbenco’s presentation (5 stars if I were actually reviewing it), but, nevertheless, there’s much to admire and be moved by in the new Kiss …, so I encourage you to give it your serious consideration.


BOTTOM LINE FINAL COMMENTS: The 2025 Kiss of the Spider Woman opened in domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters on October 10, 2025 in its widest release of 1,331 venues (now in a mere 3 of them) with a tiny gross so far of $1.6 million (worldwide a bit more at $1.7 million) so if you want to see it you’ll most likely turn to streaming where for $14.95 you can rent it from Amazon Prime Video or Apple TV.  You’ll find, though, that just like the new version of Frankenstein [2025] (Guillermo del Toro), I’m considerably more in support of this … Spider Woman than the CCAC: Rotten Tomatoes positive reviews 77%, Metacritic average score 65% (for the 1985 film their respective totals are 87%, 80%).  Sharing my strong support we have Odie Henderson of The Boston Globe: As writer and director, Condon does a commendable job of handling the film’s tonal shifts from gruesome real-life brutality to musical flights of fancy shot in gorgeous Technicolor. […] The film propels his three leads through a history of movie musicals that any diehard lover of the genre would recognize. There are flashes of Fosse, a modicum of Vincente Minnelli, and a soupçon of Stanley Donen. We’re reminded of Judy Garland in ‘Summer Stock’ and Fred Astaire in ‘The Band Wagon.’ […] As for Lopez, this is the star turn she was born to play. She makes Sergio Trujillo’s choreography look effortless. Her looks range from the extreme Louise Brooks bob of her spider-costumed title character to a coif so blonde that it glows. She leads a veritable fashion show, and she nails every song in what is often considered a lesser Kander and Ebb score. [¶] Watching J. Lo make movie magic for the captive audience on both sides of the screen reminded me why I watch movies, and how revisiting my favorite films has kept me sane and happy in this bitter little world.”


 From a less-supportive perspective, though, is Elisabeth Vincentelli  of The New York Times: Both Molina and Valentín are now wholly sympathetic, and the screenplay is more sentimental about the relationship between the two prisoners, which was shaded with calculation in the earlier renditions. [¶] But who are we kidding? A huge draw of ‘Spider Woman’ is to see Jennifer Lopez set her phaser to ‘diva’ and fire away in numbers designed to look as if they had been made on the old MGM lot. […] At least Condon captures the dancers’ full bodies and emphasizes long, or longish, takes, which helps Sergio Trujillo’s choreography take over the full screen, as it should. Some numbers feel like direct shout-outs to the ‘Girl Hunt’ ballet from ‘The Band Wagon’ and ‘Broadway Melody’ from ‘Singin’ in the Rain,’ with Lopez swanning through the flamboyantly artificial sets. For the most part, though, the X factor of elegance, sensuality and verve that made MGM musicals so memorable is missing here. You want to give an encouraging grade for effort, but effort is also the last thing you want to see in a musical.”  Whether you’d agree with the naysayers or not, I do think you’d find it fascinating how this new Kiss … follows the tactic used with Lopez to also put Luna and Tonatiuh in multiple roles (like Braga in 1985), although I was too dense to realize that despite my observant wife, Nina, insisting that’s the case until I finally saw the cast list.  Something she didn’t have to convince me about, though, is the use of my ending Musical Metaphor, “I Shall Be Released” (found on the 1971 album Bob Dylan’s Greatest Hits Vol. II) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0pkHBVznLA&list=RDE0pkHBVznLA&start_radio=1 featuring relevant lyrics like Standing next to me in this lonely crowd / Is a man who swears he’s not to blame / All day long I hear him shout so loud / Crying out that he was framed / I see my light come shining / From the west unto the east / Any day now, any day now / I shall be released.”  Molina and Valentin are each ultimately released in their separate ways, yet with disturbing outcomes (except for 2025 Valentin) that challenge the song’s hopeful attitude.  This isn't a pleasant film to watch—despite MGM allusions in Aurora’s gaudy movie—but I hope you’ll give it serious consideration to be on your viewing agenda.

           

SHORT TAKES

                

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage.  If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.

 

If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

             

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

            

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 45,903.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):


Thursday, November 13, 2025

Frankenstein [2025] plus Short Takes on some other cinematic topics

It’s Alive … Once Again

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) if they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.  However, due to COVID concerns I’m mostly addressing streaming options with limited visits to theaters, where I don’t think I’ve missed much anyway, though better options may be coming soon.  (Note: Anything in bold blue [or near purple] is a link to something in the above title or the review.)


My reviews’ premise: “You can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the song’s name)

However, if you’d like to know more about rationale of my ratings visit this explanatory site.


                   Frankenstein [2025] (Guillermo del Toro)
                                         rated R   149 min.


Here’s the trailer:

        (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge its size; 

        activate the same button or use “esc” keyboard key to return to normal.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red. OK, now continue on if you prefer.


WHAT HAPPENS: We begin in 1857 as the Danish ship Horisont, under the command of Captain Anderson (Lars Mikkelsen) was headed for the North Pole, got stuck in Arctic ice.  Injured Baron Victor Frankenstein (Oscar Isaac)—pursued by a hulking figure (Jacob Elordi) who eventually jumps under the ice—is taken aboard the ship, explains he’s this Creature’s creator, gives his backstory.  His father was a demanding surgeon who expected his son to follow in his path; sadly, his mother died in childbirth of his brother, William (Felix Kammerer as an adult), leaving Victor to vow he’d find a means to defy death.  As adults, William went to Vienna with Victor enrolling in the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh where he’s sent away after a demonstration of partially reviving a corpse (“Obscene!”).  However, rich arms merchant Henrich Harlander (Christoph Waltz) agrees to fund Victor leading to an elaborate lab built in an abandoned tower.  Victor constructs a new human made from parts of hanged men and dead soldiers from the Crimean War, with a plan to reanimate this collaged-body with the power of lightening when he learns Harlander is dying of syphilis, wants to be put into the body, but Victor refuses.  They struggle; Harlander falls to his death.


 When lightening strikes the Creature (hereafter simply called C.) it fails to come to life leaving Victor despondent which changes the next morning as C.’s now alert.  Victor chains it (he refuses to say “he”) in the building’s basement, frustrated the only word C. will say is “Victor.”  (Is C. responding to his creator as a father-figure or is it referring to itself as well, taking on the name?)  William and his fiancée, Elizabeth (Mia Goth), niece of Harlander, come to visit, with the woman oddly sympathetic to C., even as Victor lies that C. killed her uncle.  They leave as Victor, further upset with Elizabeth’s fondness for C. even as she rejects his own improper advances, sets fire to the tower, hoping to kill C. (at this point he doesn’t realize C.’s resiliency as it revives from any attack), is injured himself.  Back on the ship C.’s aboard, tells his own story of how he escaped the fire, hid in a forest shack, learned to read and speak listening to the family’s parents teach their little girl.  Eventually, C. makes his way to William and Elizabeth’s wedding, demands Victor make him a female companion, Victor refuses, a melee occurs (C. kills William), Victor tries to shoot C. though he hits Elizabeth instead, C. takes her away to die, vows ongoing misery for Victor.  Back to the present on the ship C. and Victor reconcile, Victor dies, C.—with amazing strength—pushes the ship loose to sail home, goes away in search of meaning in his (eternal?) life.⇐ (To see more plot details, please go here.)


SO WHAT? Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s seminal 1818 novel, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheushas inspired an astounding number of adaptions—or, at least, allusions—in cinematic form, 423 features according to this site, dating back to Joseph W. Smiley’s Life Without Soul (1915) with early screen fame coming from Universal Pictures’ Frankenstein (James Whale, 1931), then expanding “monstrously” into the present (although this site stops in 2024, doesn’t include del Toro’s current version), so my naïve belief that I had seen many of the stories dealing with Victor (called Henry in those early Universal movies) the doctor and/or some version of his created Creature was soon put to rest as I’ve barely scratched the surface of how especially the Creature (sometimes referred to as Adam in the movies, maybe in the novel too as I forget) has been portrayed on-screen.


 However, of the various ones I have seen over the years 3 are special favorites of mine: (1) Bride of Frankenstein (Whale, 1935)—sequel to the 1931 original—due to its mixture of humor and horror, with repeat performances from Colin Clive as the doctor, Boris Karloff as the Creature, and the inspired casting of Elsa Lanchester as Mary Shelley in the opening scene as well as the female Creature created by Henry and the truly-mad archfiend, Dr. Pretorius (Ernest Thesiger);* (2) Young Frankenstein (Mel Brooks, 1974) a marvelous parody of those first 3 Universal monster movies (including Son of Frankenstein [Rowland V. Lee, 1939]) with Gene Wilder as the grandson of the original doctor, Peter Boyle as the new Creature, and marvelous supporting work from Marty Feldman, Cloris Leachman, Madeline Kahn, Teri Garr, Kenneth Mars, but especially Gene Hackman as the blind hermit; (3) Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (Kenneth Branagh, 1994) with Branagh as the doctor, Robert De Niro as the Creature as this version steers quite close to that long-ago novel but with one strange addition that seems to be borrowed from Bride of Frankenstein as the Creature does kill Elizabeth (Helena Bonham Carter), inspiring the doctor to reanimate her, leaving her new existence in a connection-quandary between her known-human fiancée and a reconstructed being now more like her so she solves her dilemma by setting herself on fire, then dying for a second time.

 

*This movie must take its share of the “credit”/blame for the ongoing confusion in popular culture between the name of the doctor who reanimates the Creature and the imposing Creature itself with so many wrong uses of “Frankenstein” to refer to the Creature rather than the doctor.  Not only do we have the title of this 1935 movie implying a mate for the Creature but also when she’s first mobile Pretorius refers to her as “the bride of Frankenstein,” clearly an intended companion for the male Creature (yet she rejects him), not any sort of reference to Henry’s wife, Elizabeth (Valerie Hobson).


 This new film by del Toro also is generally well-connected to the original novel, except for 15 notable differences that do change the tone and intentions of the work, as explored well in this thoughtful short video (17:06 [ads interrupt at 5:08, 11:23]).**  Now, if you’ve waded through all of these citations I’ve presented and still want a bit more here’s a link to a cluster of some interesting explorations of Frankenstein-related commentary by The New York Times Maya Salam.  Yet, after all that, what am I left with in regard to this latest interpretation of Shelley’s work by del Toro?  First I must say the acting by Isaac, Elordi, Goth, and Waltz especially is first-rate, making it clear the real horror here is Victor’s misguided ambition which leads him to undermine the established intentions of God/nature (take your pick), then reject his creation not only because he initially doesn’t find it to have sufficient intellect but also due to his jealous rage that the Creature is more connected to Elizabeth than to him (even though he’s tried unsuccessfully to poach her from his younger brother).

 

**The one “difference” presented here (Spoiler alert, though if you know the basic aspects of this narrative you’d already be aware of what I’m about to say) is the Creature in this new film doesn’t ask Victor to make a companion for him, even though he does ask, with Victor’s refusal leading to C.’s disruption of William and Elizabeth’s wedding.  I’m just confused by this video's obvious mistake.

 

 True, the Creature is dangerous when provoked (although, as that video points out, he doesn’t kill certain characters from the novel, but he quickly disposes of Horisont crew members who attempt to keep him from confronting Victor), but he’s full of sorrow more than rage due to his constant rejections from virtually all of humanity—except Elizabeth—so there’s a touching sense of heartbreak here successfully reminding me of aspects of the Branagh version.  Further, based on del Toro’s previous work I think you’d find it no surprise both the set designs and cinematography are excellent.  Even if you’d find some reluctance about aspects of the presentation of the characters I think you’d enjoy just looking at this film’s cinematic beauty (OK, maybe not for a full 2½ hours—just as San Francisco Chronicle’s Mick LaSalle says you could miss the first half of this film with no regrets—so if you want to skip around until you get to the Creature’s tale you’d still have a lot of visual wonder to explore).  This is not a Halloween tale about a ruthless monster on the rampage; instead, it’s a more heartfelt exploration of need, desire, rationalized revenge that’s always been (even if buried beneath the surface) at the heart of the best renderings of Shelley’s clever concepts.


BOTTOM LINE FINAL COMMENTS: This most-recent Frankenstein opened in select domestic (U.S.-Canada) theaters on October 17, 2025, but as usual from this distributor I have little info on whether it’s still available on the big screen or how much box-office gross it might have made (although there’s an international estimate of $144.5 thousand), so to easily find it you can turn to Netflix streaming where it’s free to subscribers ($17.99 monthly if you want the no-ads version, $7.99 with ads), where you’re encouraged by the CCAL to view it with the Rotten Tomatoes positive reviews at a healthy 86%, the Metacritic average score at a supportive (for them) 78%.  Among the supporters is David Rooney of The Hollywood Reporter: “The quote from Byron with which del Toro closes the film — ‘And thus the heart will break and yet brokenly live on’ — clearly indicates the director’s vision of Frankenstein as an operatic Romantic tragedy. ‘I cannot die. And I cannot live alone,’ the Creature tells Victor during a fateful confrontation. Elordi’s dark, soulful eyes convey a piercing sadness not felt from this character since Boris Karloff’s haunted work in the Whale films, which made him one of the screen forefathers of the pitiable monster.”  (At MC, 100%.)


 Inevitably, though, others will see it differently as with Kevin Maher of The Times (London), MC 60%: “Hats off to three-time Oscar-winner Guillermo del Toro (Pan’s Labyrinth, The Shape of Water). He certainly set the bar high when he announced, midway through the 25-year gestation of this passion project, that he wanted to make nothing less than ‘the greatest Frankenstein ever!’ […] It looks nice, as if Mary Shelley’s source material had been reimagined as a lavish graphic novel, complete with poster-worthy frame composition and stark, shadow-filled close-ups. But the performances are all camp and no soul, the ideas barely there and the centrepiece creature consistently underwhelming.”  Clearly, I don’t agree with this response, but you might if you’re willing to invest yourself in this film.  A possibly easier investment is in my usual ending bit of a Musical Metaphor, this time “I Wish I Knew How It Would Feel to Be Free” (written by Billy Taylor in the early 1960s) here sung by Nina Simone (recorded version on her 1967 Silk & Soul album)a dynamically live version at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzEDYoE7YQ4&list=RDSzEDYoE7YQ4& start_radio=1, though you might have trouble hearing the lyrics that drew me to this song such as I wish I knew how it would feel to be free / I wish I could break all the chains holding me / I wish I could say all the things that I should say […] I wish I could give all I’m longing to give / I wish I could live like I’m longing to live […] Oh, I’d know how it feels / How it feels to be free” so for clarity here’s the recorded version of a Civil Rights anthem I find relevant as well to this concept of Frankenstein.

          

SHORT TAKES

            

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

 

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll to the bottom of this Summary page to see additional info about your wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage.  If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!  Please also note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us there in order to comment (FB procedures: frequently perplexing mysteries for us aged farts).

 

*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.

 

If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

             

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

            

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 45,903.  (As always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers.)  Below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):