Thursday, October 27, 2022

Short(ish) Takes on Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen, A Journey, A Song and To Leslie, plus a few other cinematic topics

A Victory March?  Let's Discuss That

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke

I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) when they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.

“You see, you can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the same name)


    Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen, A Journey, A Song
(Dayna Goldfine, Dan Geller)   rated PG-13 118 min.


Opening Chatter (no spoilers): I’m still avoiding movie theaters due to the damn COVID bugs, but even though I didn’t get to see Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson as a DC superhero (a villain at times as well?) in Black Adam (Jaume Collet-Serra) I may not have missed all that much according to the OCCU (Rotten Tomatoes 39% positive reviews, Metacritic 41% average score), although many others rushed to see it at 4,402 northern North America venues where it racked up a whopping $67 million in receipts (with a lot more overseas for a worldwide total of $210 million after just 1 weekend).  I was in more ethereal territory, though, in my streaming options by finally getting to see a marvelous documentary about songwriter/singer (also poet, novelist) Leonard Cohen and his elegant ode to much of humanity’s complex situations in his most-famous-tune, “Hallelujah” (film released in theaters back on June 30, 2022; just now come to Apple TV+, Amazon Prime Video, other streaming platforms for a $5.99 rental), one of the most soul-affirming-films I’ve ever seen, a marvelous biography of this now-departed-man that, I hope, can entrance you with what he was pursuing throughout his long career, even if you haven't paid much attention to his music previously.


 I was also intrigued with To Leslie (Michael Morris) because it’s a story set in west Texas, an area I’m quite familiar with, even though the setting turns out to be not all that specific to the “wilderness” beyond Ft. Worth (“Where the west begins”), but the performance of lead actor Andrea Riseborough should rustle a few feathers for Oscar consideration, yet I’m sure the obscure nature of this film won’t draw much attention when awards nominations come out later this year, into 2023, so even though it popped up in a few theaters on October 7, 2022 your best option for finding it will likely be for a $6.99 streaming rental on Apple TV+, but I sincerely hope you’ll consider watching it because of Riseborough‘s terrifically-mesmerizing performance.  Yet, given the Cohen doc needs to be watched more than written about while I doubt many will wander out into the west Texas wilderness to find To Leslie I’m putting both clusters of comments under my SHORT TAKES rubric because I don’t see the need to elaborate much more than that on either of them, despite my supportive ratings (plus, I’ve had a lot of usual blogging time taken up recently with watching basketball and baseball games, medical appointments, and doing some historical reclamation work for an organization I used to be actively involved with).  Also, here are links for the schedule of the cable network, Turner Classic Movies, which gives you a wide selection of older films with no commercial interruptions and the JustWatch site which offers you a wide selection of options too, for streaming rental or purchase. Or, if you want to see what reigned at the domestic (U.S.-Canada) box-office last weekend, go here.

             

SHORT TAKES (in intention, maybe not fully in reality)

                        

Here’s the trailer for Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen, A Journey, A Song:

                   (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge it; activate 

                   that same button or use the “esc” keyboard key to return to normal size.)




 There are no spoilers within my review of this documentary because everything in it could easily be found in detailed sources such as this one or even more so this extensive one, so if you want to know more than what I’m briefly summarizing here about Leonard Cohen’s life, his music, his legacy I encourage you to read more deeply into the details of his contributions not only to contemporary music (and a lot of poetry, along with some novels) but also to inspirations about how to use what he painstakingly produced in his eloquent constructions of the English language as guideposts for searching our own souls, seeking to make the most of our individual existences.  While I’ve long admired what I know of his work, I’ll admit the only album of his I ever bought was his debut, Songs of Leonard Cohen (1967), but I did have the pleasure of seeing him perform in person (Austin, TX, sometime in 1970?) and was quite taken with Robert Altman’s use of 3 of those early songs in the soundtrack of McCabe & Mrs. Miller (1971), part of an impactful deconstruction of the American western (which reached its zenith [in my opinion] with Clint Eastwood’s fabulous Unforgiven [1992]).


 So, what do we get with Hallelujah … as it traces a bit more than half of Cohen’s adult life when he turned from writing other forms of expressive language to haunting songs in 1967 (those other creative manifestations would continue with posthumously-published-poetry until 2018, a final novel and other writings in 2022, although Cohen died in 2016 at age 82).  Hallelujah … (inspired generally by Cohen’s life and works, but also directly by Alan Light’s book, The Holy or the Broken [2012]), briefly covers the musical aspects of his public years but also provides a parallel focus on the evolution/impact of his most-famous-song, “Hallelujah,” first recorded by him on his Various Positions album (1984), then continued to evolve into a staple of the humanities’ musical canon even as he continued to write verses for it, with interviewee Larry “Ratso” Sloman in this film estimating there may be anywhere from 150 to 180 of them (we get images of Cohen’s many notebooks of lyrics, along with shots of individual pages of some of those verses), so even though his “candle burned out long before [his] legend ever did” (to borrow a line from Elton John’s "Candle in the Wind" [on the 1973 Goodbye Yellow Brick Road album]), "Hallelujah," especially, will likely keep Cohen’s presence alive in our culture for decades to come, as evidenced by short clips in this film of many singers performing it as part of their professional repertory or as amateurs in talent competitions or even at weddings (that frequently-chosen-second-verse about being tied to a kitchen chair while hair’s cut off would seem a bit odd for those latter occasions, though, except for those specific types of nuptials).


 Accordingly, Hallelujah ... begins with a clip of Cohen performing the song at his final concert in Auckland, New Zealand in December 2013, then we shoot back to his public singing beginnings in the mid-1960s, first on Canadian TV (he grew up in a financially-secure-Jewish-family in Montreal) where we get a clip of his rendition of "The Stranger Song" (I’ll include videos of his versions of a couple of early songs, although the film covers a much wider range over the years), but when Judy Collins included his "Suzanne" on her In My Life album (1966),* then encouraged him to join her in large-audience-live-concerts, awareness of Cohen by music lovers really took off, leading to his debut album, followed by an ever-growing career with growing adulation from the multitudes of fans.


*While this doc and my review are centered on the remarkable life/career of Leonard Cohen, I just can’t avoid including Collins' version of this song, which made an impact early on because her angelic voice has its own ramifications, in the deeper aspects that would come to be in “Hallelujah.”


 The film Hallelujah … continues with historical info about Cohen, many comments from interviewees (including Collins), footage of various events across the decades of Cohen’s life, photos of him that increasingly look like a younger Al Pacino (maybe Al could be convinced to do a biopic of Cohen someday, as long as proper computer technology can shift his image successfully back to those younger days decades ago, though Dustin Hoffman could properly portray him as an older man); a clear chronology about how he was taken into Columbia records by producer John Hammond; featured in a 1974 Rolling Stone article; had many successful tours in North America and Europe; made an album, Death of a Ladies’ Man (1977), with “wall of sound” producer Phil Specter which he didn’t care for afterward; was stunned when his Various Positions album was nixed for U.S. release (but allowed for Europe); became aware of how other singers—Bob Dylan, John Cale, Jeff Buckley—were bringing awareness to “Hallelujah” on stage and in recordings, followed by, of all things, inclusion in the animated feature Shrek (Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson, 2001); then as depression and drinking began to overtake him he went off to a Buddhist monastery in the 1990s to regain his spiritual focus.  When the depression lifted he was back in the studio and on the road, continuing to find meaning in countless new songs while never feeling he’d successfully finished “Hallelujah," so he kept working on it, singing it by drawing on that immense collection of verses, sometimes altering ones he chose to use on a given night, so we can never really say there’s a definitive version of this now-monumentally-famous-song, which is frequently referenced in the first hour of this doc, then begins to take more prominence in the remainder.  You can tell from interview clips of Cohen plus testimony from a wealth of others about his influence he took all of his work seriously, never looking for pop hits just to bring in income.  Toward the end of this film he sums up what he feels he was all about: “You look around and you see a world that cannot be made sense of.  You either raise your fist or you say hallelujah.  I try to do both.”   We should admire such advice.


 Simply recounting more of what’s on screen is hardly worth your time or mine; this is a film you have to see to appreciate, especially to glean some deeper understanding of why this song, “Hallelujah,” resonates so passionately not only with Cohen but also with millions of his listeners (including my wife, Nina, who plays it frequently, and now even more so with me after seeing how these filmmakers have explored the combination of this man’s spiritual journey along with the consciousness-raising-experience of listening to his music).  I’ve seen a lot of documentaries, but this one verges on the realm of the transcendent, so I highly encourage you to watch it, with further encouragement from the CCAL where the Rotten Tomatoes evaluators offer 89% positive reviews while those at Metacritic contribute a (high for them) 70% average score.  While this film came out way back on June 30, 2022 it never was much of a presence in theaters, making only a little over $1 million domestically, just up to $1.4 million globally; it seems to be gone from the big screen by now, but it’s still available for a $5.99 streaming rental from Apple TV+, Amazon Prime Video, and other platforms, well worth your investment even if you’ve never known anything about Cohen previously.  As always, I’ll wrap up here with a Musical Metaphor, which of course must be “Hallelujah,” with its mesmerizing lyrics some of which I’ll offer as this verse (as best one set of words can stand for such a powerful song) speaks to me of what the whole somewhat-religious/somewhat-secular experience is about: You say I took the name in vain / I don’t even know the name / But if I did, well really, what’s it to ya? / There’s a blaze of light in every word / It doesn’t matter which you heard / The holy or the broken Hallelujah.”  Of course I’ll give you (one of) Cohen's version(s) at https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=YrLk4vdY28Q which seems semi-ecclesiastical (but Judeo-Christian, not just New Testament); however, I’ll also close, just as the film did, with k.d. lang’s powerfully-emotional version at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_NpxTWbovE which led to a worthy, lengthy standing ovation, as Cohen came to feel that she’s the one who ultimately owned the song.*


*Want to know more from the directors of Hallelujah?  Then you can read their interview in this press kit PDF; you'll probably have to use login: press, then password: sonyclassics to access it.

               

           To Leslie (Michael Morris)   rated R   119 min.


Here’s the trailer:


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


 As I had briefly noted above, my interest in To Leslie was based on its west Texas setting—which I became aware of through a very short review in The Week magazine (a marvelous package of news about national and international politics, business, the arts, travel, noted obituaries, etc., with commentary from a wide variety of publications so you get a range of opinions without concluding decisions; consider a subscription, no kickback to me if you do)—so I've spent some time out there first with one of my grandmothers, then my parents after Dad retired (specifically in the very small town on Clyde, about 15 miles from Abilene toward Ft. Worth on I-20; there’s even a brief reference in the dialogue about some place “just outside of Abilene,” so maybe the filmmakers are also aware of that quiet little wide spot in the road).  A little research got me considerably more interested because this largely-unknown-film is a CCAL celebration with the RT results at 98% positive, while the normally-more-reserved-MC folks come up with a hearty 85% average score (highest number they’ve given to any 2022 release both they and I have reviewed), so at least a few people in the critical world have been paying attention to it (admittedly, the RT number’s based on only 49 reviews, quite meager for them, while only 15 of those MCers have weighed in so far [links to these critics-accumulation-organizations are always in the Related Links section of any Two Guys posting for anything we review, so you might want to check back later to see if any further results did trickle in]).


 To provide some context about the CCCAL response, here’s Variety’s Owen Gleiberman: […] to give a truly remarkable performance as an alcoholic, you have to make good on the old line about it — that someone who’s drunk is working hard not to act that way hard. They’re trying to fool the world in the same way they fool themselves. […] For two hours, we don’t know where Leslie is going to land next any more than she does, and that lends the film a searing, unvarnished quality. […] But the movie belongs to Riseborough, who in the second half comes alive, scene by scene, like a flower slowly uncrumpling. It’s still a scarred and wounded flower, with its glory days behind it. But now, at last, it can breathe, and the audience, in response, lets out a sigh that feels like mercy.”  Similarly, The Hollywood Reporter’s Sheri Linden says:A stirring character study captured in intimate 35mm by DP Larkin Seiple and sensitively edited by Chris McCaleb, To Leslie recalls the grit of 1970s American indie cinema at its most indelible. […] That theme might be a celebration of female gumption, resilience and humor — qualities that the title character of To Leslie embodies, against the odds and against expectations. Riseborough digs deep and takes no shortcuts in tracing a hard-won path to redemption, the rage that holds Leslie back transformed into the energy that fuels her survival.”  I haven’t been able to find much about the making of this film (except screenwriter Ryan Binaco wrote it as a tribute to his mother, who may have also dealt with some of Leslie’s demons), nor do I know if it’s actually shot in west Texas.  (A cropped sign in an early shot indicates Lubbock as Leslie’s home, but it’s not definitive; if that’s where she’s supposed to be, I can say from experience this city features [at least some years ago] the most pungent stockyard smell I’ve ever encountered on a hot summer day, so this location would be appropriate for this horrible tale of woe.)


 As the story opens we get a montage of shots of Leslie (Andrea Riseborough) with her husband and small child, then one of her with a black eye so we quickly surmise when the action starts she raised the kid as a single mother (he’s 19 when we’ll meet him later, gone away to do construction work somewhere else), suddenly becomes a local celebrity along with being wealthy due to winning $190,000 in a lottery; however, a few years later most of the money’s gone (bad choices, bad investments, we’re never given a clear answer as to where it went), clearly a good portion of it boosted the profits of the nearby bar where she’s been enough of a regular customer to have had the place named after her.  By now, she’s so broke she can’t even afford to live anywhere so she buys a bus ticket to her son, James’ (Owen Teague), new location, although he’s not happy to see her, has lots of reasons to want to forget as much as possible about his childhood, so he sets down rules which include no drinking, but while he’s at work she searches his home for any cash she can find (even in the pocket of a pair of his jeans) so she can slip off to buy some booze.  James tries to get telephone advice from Grandma Nancy (Allison Janney), which irritates Leslie to no end, ending up with James sending Mom back home to live with Dutch (Stephen Root) and his wife, due to some past connection, maybe Leslie giving them some money when they needed it.  Dutch is just as harsh as James about rules, so when she once again wanders off that bar to see if she can pick up some guy (no luck), Dutch responds by locking her out, putting her suitcase outside.  She wanders to a local motel but is chased away, gets picked up by Pete (James Landry Hébert) who tries to force himself on her but she resists, then sleeps in an abandoned building.  The next day she returns to the motel where manager Sweeney (Marc Maron) seems to take pity on her, gives her a job there as a maid, even though his partner, Royal’s (Andre Royo), not impressed with this new hire.  ⇒While she begins poorly, drinking at night at the bar (where she has a confrontation with Nancy), showing up late next day, she makes a sincere effort to clean up her act with encouragement from Sweeney (his alcoholic wife ran off with their preacher) who takes her to a town dance, but feeling no one really wants her around she pushes Sweeney away, continues to feud with Nancy, backslides some, then reconciles with Sweeney who buys the abandoned ice cream shop across from the motel for her to start a business as they connect.  By 16 months later she’s reconciled with James as well.⇐


 You might find the ending here a bit too upbeat given all that’s gone before (hard to even elude to it without stumbling into a Spoiler reveal, but please try to appreciate my vagueness as the whole purpose here is to show how difficult it can be to break out of a cycle of self-destruction, finally find the willingness to make needed changes even when setbacks seem to scuttle those attempts).  Sure, this isn’t a pleasant story to watch and may even prove triggering for anyone who’s having difficulty trying to stay sober after indulging for far too long, but if you can bear with it I think you’ll find Riseborough’s performance to be astounding, clearly Oscar-worthy when nominations are due in a few months.  Seemingly, it was in some theaters as of October 7, 2022, but I find no account of it except on Apple TV+ streaming for $6.99 rental, nor can I say it clearly evoked what I know of west Texas (if you want that for sure, watch Hell or High Water [David Mackenzie, 2016; review in our August 26, 2016 posting; available to stream for a $3.99 rental from Apple TV+, Amazon Prime Video, other platforms], but just be sure before ordering at the T-Bone Cafe that you know what you don't want), with a setting that could be anywhere on the Great Plains, but what you will want after seeing this film is more of Andrea Riseborough, whose performance is nothing short of magnifcent.


 Further, seeing how this excellent actor explored the role of battered-Leslie gives me another opportunity to bring Leonard Cohen back on stage for this final Musical Metaphor with his brooding “Bird on the Wire” (on his 1969 Songs from a Room album) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGvwvxA83Cs (as usual, some words are different from the recording, but they’re all still marvelous to hear) because I can easily hear Leslie singings lyrics such as these: “Like a baby, stillborn / Like a beast with his horn / I have torn everyone who reached out for me / But I swear by this song / And by all that I have done wrong / I will make it all up to thee.  I saw this beggar leaning on his wooden crutch / He said to me, ‘You must not ask for so much’ / And a pretty woman leaning in her darkened door / She cried out to me, “Hey, why not ask for more?’ “  Leslie’s obviously had a hard life, made bad decisions, fallen deep into alcohol addiction while attempting to maintain some semblance of a positive self-understanding; her journey (like some aspects of Cohen’s actual life) is often hard to watch, but I encourage you to make the effort to find this small film (along with the great Cohen doc), not like much else that you’ll encounter in most current theatrical or streaming options.


 That’s all for my critical commentary this week (which usually reminds me of some parting lyrics from Pink Floyd’s "Time": The time is gone, the song is over, thought I’d something more to say,” or maybe R.E.M. knows me even better [from "Losing My Religion"]: Oh no, I’ve said too much / I haven’t said enough”), but whether you agree with any of that stuff or not I’ll offer you one more opportunity to be in unity with an attitude that would benefit all of us, James Taylor’s "Shower the People" (on his 1976 In the Pocket album), because we should “Shower the people you love with love / Show them the way that you feel / Things are gonna be much better/ If you only will.”  We’re now sailing through divisive times; it could be a smoother ride if we’d only help each other a bit more.


Other Cinema-Related Stuff: Henry Cavell says, gladly: "I am back as Superman."

            

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

           

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll down to the bottom of this Summary page to see some additional info about you wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!


*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.


Here’s more information about Hallelujah: Leonard Cohen, A Journey, A Song:


https://www.sonyclassics.com/film/hallelujah/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KUxXQzHGBI (42:08 discussion of the film with directors Dan Geller and Dayna Goldfine, executive producer/head of the Cohen estate Robert Kory)


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hallelujah_leonard_cohen_a_journey_a_song


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/hallelujah-leonard-cohen-a-journey-a-song


Here’s more information about To Leslie:


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8129806/ (best I could do for an official site)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Evu4t4y0lHs (2:58 interview with actor Marc Maron)


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/to_leslie


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/to-leslie


Please note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us at that site in order to do it (most FB procedures are still a bit of a mystery to us old farts).


If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.


OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.


Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 18,278 (as always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with our hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers); below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (with appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):


Thursday, October 20, 2022

Rosaline plus Short Takes on Werewolf by Night along with some other cinematic topics

Historical Anomalies

Reviews and Comments by Ken Burke


I invite you to join me on a regular basis to see how my responses to current cinematic offerings compare to the critical establishment, which I’ll refer to as either the CCAL (Collective Critics at Large) when they’re supportive or the OCCU (Often Cranky Critics Universe) when they go negative.


“You see, you can’t please everyone, so you got to please yourself.”

(from "Garden Party" by Rick Nelson and the Stone Canyon Band, 1972 album of the same name)


         Rosaline (Karen Maine)   rated PG-13   96 min.


Opening Chatter (no spoilers): As I’m still attempting to dodge COVID (successful so far) by avoiding places like movie theaters for the present, I find I wouldn’t have missed too much anyway (except the few recent openings I’ve noted in these past few Opening Chatter postings), although I do want to see the racism-confrontation-drama dealing with the horrid lynching of a Black teenager in Till (Chinonye Chukwu)deserves a lot bigger response than it’s gotten but hopefully will build nicely as it spreads to considerably more venues (opened on just 16 screens)—however, if my goal is to avoid indoor crowds (especially as mask-wearers are on the wane), I’d have needed to stay away from Halloween Ends (David Gordon Green) with its massive $57.2 million global debut ($40 million of that right here in northern North America) as Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) and Michael Myers (James Jude Courtney) supposedly finally finish off this long-running series (although the current movie’s actually part of a recent trilogy, essentially ignoring most everything before, with the first of that set, just called Halloween [Green, 2018], as a sequel to the original [John Carpenter, 1978], even using the same direct title [then Green had Halloween Kills in 2021]); lucky for me, after seeing Carpenter’s inauguration of this franchise I haven’t felt the need to visit any more of them anyway, so, yes, while I could have streamed it on Peacock as it simultaneously debuted on the big-screen (seems OK with Universal, but theater owners didn’t care for that decision as they felt their take could have been even higher without the home-video-competition) I chose not to.  Content with whatever my streaming options might be I came across an intriguing concept in Rosaline (on Hulu and Disney+; free with monthly subscriptions) where a character briefly mentioned in Shakespeare’s version of Romeo and Juliet (1597) now takes center-stage in her attempts to regain the interest of her former love, a story that I found to be quite charming (and funny), well worth your consideration.


 Next, I came upon a rare object, a Marvel/Disney story that clocks in at just under an hour, a self-standing-narrative called Werewolf by Night that doesn’t spin off from any previous Marvel screen-work nor does it (so far?) lead into some ongoing-series, yet you’ll find it’s intended to fit into the Marvel Cinematic Universe so there may well be more to come of this hairy character.  This one’s free also with a Disney+ subscription, so Walt’s legacy corporation has full command of what I’m offering this week with the main event technically from 20th Century Studios, now a Disney property, while a Werewolf …’s streaming platform, Hulu, is part of Disney’s empire too (pure coincidence here; I get nothing from them—except a monthly bill, soon set to increase—should you choose to watch either of my suggestions).  Also, here are links for the schedule of the cable network, Turner Classic Movies, which gives you a wide selection of older films with no commercial interruptions and the JustWatch site offering their own wide selection of options for streaming rental or purchase.  If you want to see what all reigned at the domestic (U.S.-Canada) box-office last weekend, go here.


Here’s the trailer for Rosaline:

                   (Use the full screen button in the image’s lower right to enlarge it; activate 

                   that same button or use the “esc” keyboard key to return to normal size.)


If you can abide plot spoilers read on, but this blog’s intended for those who’ve seen the film or want to save some $ (as well as recognizing those readers like me who just aren’t that tech-savvy).  To help any of you who want to learn more details yet avoid these all-important plot-reveals I’ll identify any give-away sentences/sentence-clusters with colors plus arrows: 

⇒The first and last words will be noted with arrows and red.⇐ OK, now continue on if you prefer.


What Happens: We open in the fair city of Verona, Italy (northern part of the country, on the Adige River) “A Really Long Time Ago” as an opening graphic tells us, where young Romeo (Kyle Allen) of the Montague clan (one of the 2 rival groups pushing for command in the city) climbs up to the balcony of his love, a young woman of the rival Capulets; however, we quickly know we’re not fully in the narrative of Shakespeare’s famous play because: (1) This Capulet is Rosaline (Kaitlyn Dever), Juliet’s cousin; (2) When Romeo attempts to woo Rosaline with poetic flattery she brushes off his flowery language, making it clear this dialogue will be from the 21st century, not the Bard’s prose (back then people didn’t speak in iambic pentameter either)—both of these new aspects of this tale indicate this version will be played more for comedy than romantic drama.  Obviously, Rosaline can’t let her family know she’s secretly seeing Romeo so she has to suffer her father, Adrian Capulet’s (Bradley Whitford), constant attempts to match her up with a suitor, all of whom (mostly many years her senior) she easily rejects, including dashing Dario (Sean Teale) who’s slow to take “no” for an answer, so he convinces her to take a short boat trip with him on the day of the huge Capulet masked ball that evening.  Due to unexpected problems with the weather, they’re out on the water much later than intended so she’s furious, finally gets to the ball too late, not able as intended to quietly meet up with Romeo.  She’s even more upset when she learns Romeo, unable to find Rosaline (even under the masks), suddenly became intensely-enamored with cousin Juliet (Isabel Merced) who’s now his secret paramour (in those days if you were young, rich, handsome, and popular your love-interests could turn on a dime; oh, wait a minute, that’s still likely the case in high school today I guess [it has been a few decades since I was part of that constantly-traumatic-scene—not that I was considered rich, handsome, or particularly-popularbut I bet little’s changed]).


 However, Rosaline, despite her anger about being so quickly dumped by Romeo, is determined to get him back, working on advice from Nurse Janet (Minnie Driver).  Rosaline’s further frustrated by no response from letters she sends to Romeo so she takes revenge by hiding letters he’s instead sending to Juliet.  Rosaline then ups her scheming-anti first by convincing Juliet to “sample at the buffet of life” rather than settle so quickly for an available man, then convinces her gay friend, Count Paris (Spencer Stevenson), to court Juliet, which shocks and annoys her when the Capulets are supportive, then comes to understand Rosaline’s maneuvers.  Romeo’s persistent, though, plans a wedding to Juliet which Rosaline finds out about so she and Dario sneak into the Montague quarters, intending to stop this union, only to barely escape the estate’s guards (so the marriage takes place), at which point Dario decides to return to the navy, getting no sense he has any future with Rosaline.


 Rosaline finally decides she doesn’t love Romeo (fickleness has never been confined to any specific gender, chronological age, or time-period, of course, as with Romeo previoiusly), attempts to send his Juliet-letters back to her, but they’re confiscated by hotheaded-Capulet-kinsman Tybalt (Alistair Toovey), ultimately leading to Romeo accidentally killing him in a duel (as we eventually get back to Shakespeare’s version for a bit), so the clans are now ready for all-out-war.  Rosaline and Dario come to tell Juliet they’ll smuggle her and Romeo to safety, but she’s already had her dose of the sleeping potion to fake her death so her body’s taken away from the Capulet estate, but when Romeo arrives (unlike in the original story) he knows about the fakery from Dario’s revelation so even when she awakens they both pretend to be dead, allowing Rosaline to chastise both clans, send them all away.  As this story wraps up, Romeo and Juliet sail away as Rosaline and Dario kiss so all seems to end well for everyone; however, in a mid-credits scene we find our famous lovers on their boat, already squabbling a bit, trying to find some common interests, leaving us to wonder how long this rewritten-love-affair will last or, maybe, if they would have been better off dead after all.*⇐


*When I saw this ultimate finale, I couldn’t help but think of the ending scene in The Graduate (Mike Nichols, 1967) where the Dustin Hoffman and Katharine Ross characters make a dramatic escape from her wedding, get away by hopping on a city bus, go to the farthest rear seats, giddy with their brazen act, slowly staring at the camera (as Nichols caught them off-guard by not saying “cut” in this final shot, leaving them both looking perplexed as the soundtrack finishes off with a repeat of Simon and Garfunkel’s haunting “Sounds of Silence”).  Further, I imagined how this ending (fantastic as it is) might have been even more specific and could be tied in even further to Rosaline if that film had been made much later with the end song instead being Talking Heads’ "Once in a Lifetime" (from the 1980 album Remain in Light), especially with the lyrics of “Same as it ever was” and "You may say to yourself ‘My God, what have I done?’ " (one of the last things you probably ever want to say).


So What? If what you’d like to see on screen is a lauded, traditional approach to an adaptation of the famous play, Romeo and Juliet, then you’d surely appreciate this version by Franco Zeffirelli (1968), using the original title and dialogue, starring Leonard Whiting and Olivia Hussey (won Oscars for Best Screenplay, Costume Design, nominated for Best Picture, Director; streaming rental on Apple TV+ for $3.99).  If, instead, you prefer the structure and dialogue of the original but want to see it put into a contemporary setting then you should probably explore Baz Luhrmann’s William Shakespeare's Romeo + Juliet (1996; also available for a $3.99 streaming rental on Apple TV+ or free on HBO Max if you’re a subscriber) with Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes in the title roles (OK, nobody plays Shakespeare in this version, so just focus on the young lovers please) set in Verona Beach (seems to be southern CA or FL) where the Montagues and Capulets are feuding gangs so it’s now pistols instead of swords.  (Of course, if you're up for a musical adaptation there's always either version of West Side Story).  However, if you’re willing to be aware of the narrative of the foundational play but accept how a character who’s barely mentioned in that original* becomes the lead in a more-freewheeling-adaption** then I think you’d find a lot to enjoy with Rosaline's story.


*See Stephanie Zacharek's TIME review of Rosaline for a bit more on this Capulet's stage origins.


** Another comedic adaption of Shakespeare along these lines is Rosencrantz & Guildenstern Are Dead, focusing on 2 minor characters from Hamlet whose unknown set-up for betrayal of the “Mad Prince” ends in their own (offstage) demise, after which they're made into primary characters, first in a theatrical version (Tom Stoppard, 1966), then in a much-later-cinematic-adaptation (Stoppard, 1990, starring Gary Oldman and Tim Roth; once again, available on Apple TV+ for a $3.99 rental—maybe they’re having a special on Shakespeare-related-material.  Just for curiosity, I also checked a couple of versions of Hamlet, found the same streaming platform, same rental price [although free to HBO Max subscribers] for both the Laurence Olivier version [1948; won Oscars for Best Picture, Actor {Olivier}, Art Direction-Set Decoration – Black and White, Costume Design – Black and White, along with noms for Best Director, Supporting Actress {Jean Simmons}; runs 155 min., cuts out much of the dialogue, nothing about Rosencrantz and Guildenstern] and the Kenneth Branagh version [1996; complete text so it runs 242 min., but R & G are in there, for the mild comic relief they’d originally intended to be, giving a correct foundation for how they sort of wander into the play territory of Waiting for Godot {Samuel Beckett, 1963} at times in their own film from Stoppard]; some Oscar noms for Branagh’s version, no wins [there'd be 5 stars from me if I'd ever review it, though]).


 Rosaline features a welcome condensed running time so it flows along in an easy manner without dragging in all of the large cast from Shakespeare’s play, the main ones here being Adrian Capulet, Tybalt, Count Paris (not gay in the original) and the Nurse, with quick appearances by a few others so you don’t need a program to keep up with the players (even though you wouldn’t find Dario in such a listing as he’s an add-on to connect with the enormously-expanded-role of Rosaline).  There’s lots of effective humor here, along with the surprise ending which seems to take a hint from the revised (more acceptable) history of the Charles Manson-led-murder-attempts from Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (Quentin Tarantino, 2019; review in our August 1, 2019 posting).  Ultimately, like Romeo + Juliet, Rosaline may provide a useful strategy to get Shakespeare-phobic-potential-viewers into some level of interest in the original version, then have something to discuss at length with friends about these somewhat-parallel-tales of star-crossed-lovers, given that in our sometimes-more-tolerant-contemporary-societies there are still unnecessary, unhealthy objections by various groups—or, at least, bigoted individuals within those groupswho refuse to respect, interact with, find common ground with people they oppose for no good reason except inbred-prejudices, family orientations toward such hate, or the easy persuasions of our “in-crowd” manipulations now so easily spread on social media. Maybe the humorous rejection of a lot of these attitudes in Rosaline could be helpful in shining a needed light on such ignorant dismissals as these characters may dwell in a time centuries before us, but they continue to act, think, and talk in ways we should quickly relate to.


Bottom Line Final Comments: The CCAL largely backs me up, as those surveyed by Rotten Tomatoes give Rosaline 75% positive reviews while the others at Metacritic are lower (as is often the case) with a 61% average score (which for them means “Generally favorable reviews” as they frequently don’t get into even the 70s range for their evaluations I’m aware of).  As examples of what value some of the folks find in Rosaline here’s Tomris Laffly of Variety who says:Considering countless modernized costume dramas and TV shows in the vein of ‘Bridgerton,’ ‘Dickinson’ and Lena Dunham’s nifty medieval coming-of-ager ‘Catherine Called Birdy’ [none of which, I admit, I’m familiar with, but I’ll take her word for it]  — not to mention iconic ’90s flicks like ‘Clueless’ and ‘Cruel Intentions’ that transposed classic texts to the present day — Maine’s likeminded outing might not render as instantly original. Still, her film succeeds at heartily seizing the timely idea at the core of those titles, displaying a feminist and feminine understanding of young women with desires, fears and preoccupations […] Perhaps Rosaline can have it all, and become both a cartographer — her vocational ambition — and Dario’s lover as she wishes. Not necessarily for as long as they both shall live, but as long as her feral heart desires.”  Then there's Lovia Gyarkye of The Hollywood Reporter who offers: Rosaline, which premieres on Hulu on Oct. 14, joins the handful of works (Sharman Macdonald’s play After Juliet, Shonda Rhimes’ ABC drama Still Star-Crossed) that redirect the spotlight, making Romeo’s first love the protagonist. […] Anachronistic pop music choices set a convivial mood and underscore that Shakespeare’s tragic romance was really about horny and impetuous teens. […] Love is the major force rippling through Rosaline, one in which our protagonist comes to understand over the course of the film.”  It's obvious; I'm on board with these perspectives.


 Of course, if the critical consensus is only about ¾ of the way at best toward full acceptance, then there must be those not so impressed, such as Natalia Winkelman of The New York Times who counters with: For never was a story of more woe than this — and I’m not talking about the trysts of Romeo. ‘Rosaline,’ Karen Maine’s hapless Shakespeare reimagining, stages history’s most famous romance from the novel perspective of Rosaline, Romeo’s jilted ex. It’s a clever enough gimmick. But in playing out the reverie, the movie epitomizes a du jour Hollywood adaptation style that’s nothing short of agonizing, planting one foot in the source material and the other in a cheeky 21st-century sensibility. […]  Shall I compare the screenwriters Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber (‘(500 Days) of Summer’) to the Bard? I’d rather not.”  Well, as Rick Nelson and I always remind you at the beginnings of these postings, “You can’t please everyone,” so I’ll leave it to you to decide whether Rosaline (streaming free on Hulu and Disney+, if you subscribe to either) stirs up your interest or not.


 While you’re deciding you might want to listen to my usual review-conclusion-tactic of a Musical Metaphor for some final commentary on the cinematic-subject at hand, but this time I’ll give you 2 of some silly relevance to match the movie’s mood.  First, we have a more plaintive position from Rosaline toward her lost love, Romeo, with Player’s “Baby Come Back” (on their 1977 Player album) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2d5y4mzteI8, although you have to switch gender-singers in your mind to have this strong-minded-Capulet-girl pleading with her lost Montague boy: “Baby come back, oh baby, any kind of fool could see / There was something in everything about you / Baby come back, you can blame it all on me / I was wrong and I just can’t live without you.”  As the story moves along, though, she begins to see  Dario might be a better match—which he felt from the beginning—so she’d be more open to his argument they could be as successful a couple as the cousin and the ex- seem fated to be, as stated in The Reflections’ “(Just Like) Romeo and Juliet” (on the 1964 album named for the song) at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycCZX-olchU “I’m gonna put Romeo’s fame / Right smack dab outta date,” although he admits he needs a solid connection with Rosaline or “Our love’s gonna be destroyed by a tragedy,” as least as the original story goes for the famous lovers, yet better options await for all as the events of Rosaline unfold (although Romeo and Juliet may be facing a different type of tragedy, the longer they keep sailing).

           

SHORT TAKES (spoilers also appear here)

             
                      Werewolf by Night (Michael Giacchino)
                                rated PG-13, TV-14   53 min.


From the pages of Marvel Comics comes this tale of a group of famed monster hunters who are called to kill a deadly beast with the reward being possession of the Bloodstone, which aids in such difficult tasks; the most successful previous hunter teams up with the daughter of the previous Bloodstone possessor with success, until the stone reveals he’s also a monster: a vicious werewolf.


Here’s the trailer:


       Before reading further, please refer to the plot spoilers warning detailed far above.


 While I’m generally keeping to my resolution to mostly avoid superhero movies/fantasy streaming series right now (MCU overload, although I insist on some wiggle room with Thor [… Love and Thunder {Taika Waititi; review in our September 15, 2022 posting}], anything new about Wonder Woman or Aquaman, possibly Black Adam [Jaume Collet-Serra] as well sometime after its October 21, 2022 debut) Disney+ streaming keeps drawing me in to watch with Marvel additions given some fascinating premises, so I’ve seen WandaVision last year, Moon Knight, and a couple of episodes of She-Hulk: Attorney at Law this year (really liked the first mini-series, was reasonably-OK with the second, could probably have kept with the third [nicely entertaining, good use of humor] if other autumn-returning-TV series didn’t take up too much time [along with end-of-season baseball leading to the World Series, beginning of fall-season Golden State Warriors basketball] to have room for this impressive green monster, in scenes both in and out of the courtroom), so when the opportunity to watch a short Marvel TV special of under an hour which gets into the horror zone of their stories (which I’m not nearly as familiar with as their superhero tales, but the second item about this entry in Related Links a bit farther below [beware of interrupting ads in this video at 1:00, 5:24] gives you plenty of details not only of how this main character in Werewolf by Night fits into that ever-expanding MCU but also how this protagonist-lycanthrope has a substantial history in Marvel Comics—as do many MCU stories on screen; useful background for me, as I have scant-connection with this huge trove of colorful print material), I decided to check it out, then pass on some reactions to you, especially due to the CCAL’s solid support (RT 90% positive reviews, MC 69% average score).


 The basic story here is famed monster-killer Ulysses Bloodstone’s (voice of Richard Dixon) dead, so his widow, Verussa (Harriet Sansom), calls together 5 famous monster-hunters to kill a beast, the winner receiving the magical Bloodstone which helps in these pursuits (no penalties for killing the other hunters if needed).  Verussa’s not pleased, though, when her disgruntled-daughter, Elsa (Laura Donnelly), also shows up after a 20-year-absence, insists on entering the contest, where she soon teams up with Jack Russell (Gael Garcia Bernal), the most successful of these creature-killers, with a few of their fellow-contestants soon dispatched after having made the mistake of trying to kill either one of them.  Russell soon finds the specific monster they’re after is someone he knows, the Man-Thing—actually named Ted (Carey Jones), whom Jack was trying to find anyway—so his focus is now on helping this huge beast escape rather than killing him.  As Ted runs away into the forest, Elsa snags the Bloodstone off of his back; however, at Verussa’s command, Elsa and Jack are soon in a cage as the stone responds actively to Jack, indicating he’s a monster: what, we don't know yet.


 ⇒To secure their freedom, Elsa uses the Bloodstone to fully release Jack’s vicious werewolf alter-identity (inherited through his father’s bloodline), but she’s safe from him as he recognizes her from his other persona.  Jack gets away, Verussa’s about to kill Elsa, but Ted returns, kills Verussa, goes back to the forest, next morning he’s with Jack (in human form again), while Elsa has possession of the Bloodstone and her father’s manor.⇐    While I enjoyed the black & white cinematography, the art direction look honoring Universal Studios’ 1930s horror movies (with some scenes that even evoke the German Expressionist classic Metropolis [Fritz Lang, 1927]—including the face makeup on Jack, which he says is a tribute to his father)—and the occasional intentional humor (“Over the Rainbow” on the soundtrack toward the end; the silly sight of animatronic-corpse Ulysses talking to the assembled hunters), I can’t help but feel this is simply an elongated-teaser preparing us for another Marvel/Disney streaming series (or maybe even a movie that more actively links into the MCU).  It’s fun to watch as a Halloween warmup, doesn’t take up much of your time, and is free if you’re a Disney+ subscriber (available since October 7, 2022), so take a look if you like.  Otherwise, maybe all you need is my Musical Metaphor which I think could only be Creedence Clearwater Revival’s “Bad Moon Rising” (on their 1969 Green River album) at https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=ALkaW6CTHJA because when the moon (or the Bloodstone) turns Jack into a werewolf everyone, except for Elsa, should know “Don’t go around tonight / Well, it’s bound to take your life / There’s a bad moon on the rise.”  However, even as a human Jack’s a dangerous guy if he’s actually killed 100 of his fellow monsters, so I’m a bit concerned by that.  Should I visit my local comic-book-store for added research?  Maybe I’ll just wait and see if Jack Russell starts prowling around again.


 That’s all for my critical commentary this week (which usually reminds me of some parting lyrics from Pink Floyd’s "Time": “The time is gone, the song is over, thought I’d something more to say,” or maybe R.E.M. knows me even better [from "Losing My Religion"]: “Oh no, I’ve said too much / I haven’t said enough”), but whether you agree with any of that stuff or not I’ll offer you one more opportunity to be in unity with an attitude that would benefit all of us, James Taylor’s "Shower the People" (on his 1976 In the Pocket album), because we should “Shower the people you love with love / Show them the way that you feel / Things are gonna be much better/ If you only will.”  We’re now sailing through divisive times; it could be a smoother ride if we’d only help each other a bit more.


Other Cinema-Related Stuff: Here is the only extra item I could find this week you might like to find out: (1) In November 2022 Netflix will offer a cheaper streaming plan but with ads.

           

Related Links Which You Might Find Interesting:

      

We encourage you to visit the Summary of Two Guys Reviews for our past posts* (scroll down to the bottom of this Summary page to see some additional info about you wacky critic, Ken Burke, along with contact info and a great retrospective song list).  Overall notations for this blog—including Internet formatting craziness beyond our control—may be found at our Two Guys in the Dark homepage If you’d like to Like us on Facebook (yes?) please visit our Facebook page.  We appreciate your support whenever and however you can offer it unto us!


*Please ignore previous warnings about a “dead link” to our Summary page because the problem’s been manually fixed so that all postings since July 11, 2013 now have the proper functioning link.


Here’s more information about Rosaline:


https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1777606/ (best I could find for an official site)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lorpMywtf0 (4:25 interview with actors Kaitlyn Dever and Sean Teale) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUTFPyCZPFY (4:18 interview with actors Isabela Merced and Kyle Allen) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HMQdcVN_Mo (4:21 interview with director Karen Maine)


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rosaline


https://www.metacritic.com/movie/rosaline


Here’s more information about Werewolf by Night:


https://disneyplusoriginals.disney.com/movie/werewolf-by-night


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwUsgdwWiZE (10:30 explanation of this movie fits 

into the MCU)


https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/werewolf_by_night 


https://www.metacritic.com/tv/werewolf-by-night


Please note that to Post a Comment below about our reviews you need to have either a Google account (which you can easily get at https://accounts.google.com/NewAccount if you need to sign up) or other sign-in identification from the pull-down menu below before you preview or post.  You can also leave comments at our Facebook page, although you may have to somehow register with us at that site in order to do it (most FB procedures are still a bit of a mystery to us old farts).


If you’d rather contact Ken directly rather than leaving a comment here at the blog please 

use my email address of kenburke409@gmail.com—type it directly if the link doesn’t work.

          

OUR POSTINGS PROBABLY LOOK BEST ON THE MOST CURRENT VERSIONS OF MAC OS AND THE SAFARI WEB BROWSER (although Google Chrome usually is decent also); OTHERWISE, BE FOREWARNED THE LAYOUT MAY SEEM MESSY AT TIMES.

         

Finally, for the data-oriented among you, Google stats say over the past month the total unique hits at this site were 18,278 (as always, we thank all of you for your ongoing support with our hopes you’ll continue to be regular readers); below is a snapshot of where those responses have come from within the previous week (with appreciation for the unspecified “Others” also visiting Two Guys’ site):